Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NRA Appeals Seventh Circuit Ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court
NRA-ILA ^ | 06/04/09 | unk

Posted on 06/04/2009 5:59:45 AM PDT by epow

On Wednesday, June 3, the National Rifle Association filed a petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of NRA v. Chicago. The NRA strongly disagrees with yesterday's decision issued by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, holding that the Second Amendment does not apply to state and local governments


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 7thcircuit; appeal; banglist; chicago; decision; lawsuit; nra; ruling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 801-802 next last
To: FreeSouthernAmerican
But in essence what you are saying is that, at will, states are given to do whatever they please?

Have you ever thought about someday actually reading the Constitution? Here's a sample:

Section 10 - Powers prohibited of States

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.


421 posted on 06/04/2009 4:01:35 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

That’s really whack, man.


422 posted on 06/04/2009 4:01:55 PM PDT by savedbygrace (You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
They are “government”

NOT federal government. NOT Congress.

423 posted on 06/04/2009 4:02:29 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

“To suppose arms in the hands of citizens, to be used at individual discretion, except in private self-defense, or by partial orders of towns, countries or districts of a state, is to demolish every constitution, and lay the laws prostrate, so that liberty can be enjoyed by no man; it is a dissolution of the government.” —John Adams


424 posted on 06/04/2009 4:03:30 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: Mojave; Dead Corpse; VRWCmember

I used to watch this on TV, “Jane you ignorant slut.”


425 posted on 06/04/2009 4:03:41 PM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Thank you, I have no doubt that the Feds are not my friends. Never said as such either. I thank you though for a better interpretation of what Mojave was saying. No offense Mojave, but the explanations just weren’t all that clear from what you were telling me. I’ll take the fault on that one though. Being said though, I think we were trying to arrive at the same conclusion through different means, my apologies.


426 posted on 06/04/2009 4:05:42 PM PDT by FreeSouthernAmerican (All we ask is to be let alone----Jefferson Davis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

Advice to the reader:
you can cruise though reading this thread a lot quicker if
you ignore any message that is either to or from mojave
and you will not miss anything important.


427 posted on 06/04/2009 4:06:07 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (When the time comes, right thinking men will know what to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

“Have you ever thought about someday actually reading the Constitution?”

As much as I would like to degrade you after that remark, I will pass.

Thank you for the kind vote of confidence. /s


428 posted on 06/04/2009 4:07:13 PM PDT by FreeSouthernAmerican (All we ask is to be let alone----Jefferson Davis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th
Like facts, quotes, sources and links. All that really matters is feelings.
429 posted on 06/04/2009 4:07:51 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: FreeSouthernAmerican

I think that the Government Printing Office will send you one if you write and ask them for it.


430 posted on 06/04/2009 4:09:24 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Thank you for your time.


431 posted on 06/04/2009 4:09:52 PM PDT by FreeSouthernAmerican (All we ask is to be let alone----Jefferson Davis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
Read the preamble to the Bill of Rights.
...
The Constitution was a grant of powers FROM the states TO the federal government, not the other way around.

Read the preamble to the Constitution.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

The People ordained and established the Constitution, not the States, which both grants powers to the federal government, and removes powers from the states. It restricts both in the exercise of their powers, which are strictly limited in the case of the Federal government, more general in the case of the states.

Even the preamble to the BoR that you cite talks about the Conventions of the states, not the states themselves. The Conventions represented the people of the states, not the states as governmental entitities.

432 posted on 06/04/2009 4:12:56 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies]

To: FreeSouthernAmerican

Government Printing Office
732 N. Capitol Street, NW
Washington, DC 20401


433 posted on 06/04/2009 4:12:58 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
What? I don’t see what the heck you are talking about

How could you? No one else does, and I'm not even sure that he does either.

All I can deduce from his posts is that he loves the draconian firearms laws his own state of California imposes on it's citizens and doesn't want any interference from the SCOTUS that might infringe on CA's spurious "right" to ignore the 2nd Amendment. He wants to make us believe that Madison didn't intend the 2nd to protect the right of ALL law abiding American people to keep and bear arms, but only intended it to protect that right from the feds for the benefit of those people whose state "allows" them to have guns. No state can "allow" or disallow people to exercise an unalienable right, it can only deny that such a right exists. A right is not a right if a state can allow or disallow it to it's people, it has then been made into a privilege.

434 posted on 06/04/2009 4:14:10 PM PDT by epow ("Never take council of your fears" .....General Thomas "Stonewall " Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
The People ordained and established the Constitution, not the States, which both grants powers to the federal government, and removes powers from the states.

Explicitly, in Article 1, Section 8. Not the Bill of Rights. Which was not part of the original Constitution, BTW.

435 posted on 06/04/2009 4:16:33 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
yeah, that’d be like arguing that the 1st amendment restricted a states right to set up an offical church, or outlaw FR in that state.

The first amendment is predicated by Congress shall make no law. The Second is not. The Constitution applies to the states and the federal government alike. It's just that most of it is very specific in it's application to only the organization of the federal government. Most, but not all. Art. I, Section 10 contains restrictions on the states. The 10th amendment protects the powers of the states, and those of the people.

436 posted on 06/04/2009 4:20:08 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: epow
All I can deduce from his posts is that he loves the draconian firearms laws his own state of California imposes on it's citizens

Predictable ignorance.

The Second Amendment has NEVER invalidated any of those laws. Our state Constitution has though. Like when then Mayor Diane Feinstein's municipal handgun ban was overturned.

437 posted on 06/04/2009 4:21:03 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

I suspect you are misinterpreting that statement, probably because it is long and complex. Here it is along with quotes from many other Founders and wise men of that age in support of the right of the people to keep and bear arms:

http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/wew/quotes/arms.html

Coming from the George Mason Economics Department, I suspect Dr. Walter Williams might have played a role in this page being composed on that website. I don’t know if that’s so, but I imagine it.


438 posted on 06/04/2009 4:32:37 PM PDT by savedbygrace (You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: epow

The 7th circuit is flagging their nose at the SCOTUS.


439 posted on 06/04/2009 4:40:44 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
The "Civil War" didn't dissolve the states.

No it united them, but denied them equal representation, and oppresses them to this day. The voting rights act being a recent example.

440 posted on 06/04/2009 4:42:15 PM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 393 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 801-802 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson