Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mojave

Which mens that the dlegates to those states were represntatives of “the people”. Now tell me again why “we the people” would ratify a doucment that allows State governments to disarm them, forbid them from practicing their religion or, for that matter, declaring all men above the age of 30 to be murdered by the state for nor reaon or any reason?


259 posted on 06/04/2009 11:22:07 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
Which mens that the dlegates to those states were represntatives of “the people”.

Just as state legislators are representatives of the people.

Now tell me again why “we the people” would ratify a doucment that allows State governments to disarm them

Their existing state constitutions and laws allowed or forbade that prior to the Constitutional Convention delegating limited powers to the newly formed federal government.

If they wanted to amend their state constitutions, they would have amended their state constitutions.

267 posted on 06/04/2009 11:30:21 AM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson