Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MICHELLE GOES TO BAT FOR SONIA (ladies who agree p/b abortion's a legit medical procedure?)
NY POST ^ | 6/4/09 | JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS, AP

Posted on 06/04/2009 6:27:28 AM PDT by Liz

NEWT RECANTS 'RACISM' Michelle Obama was dispatched to defend Sonia Sotomayor, part of a broad offensive to humanize the judge....she compared the judge's humble beginnings and high achievement to the paths taken by her husband and herself. Sotomayor grew up in a Bronx housing project and went on to Princeton and Yale "still looks over her shoulder and wonders if she measures up," Obama said.....a subtle counter to Republicans' concerns whether her personal biases would interfere with judicial decisions. Gingrich told supporters he shouldn't have called Sotomayor a racist.....but her 2001 speech that the rulings of a "wise Latina" would be better than those of a white male, was still unacceptable.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: flotusmichelle; proaborts; sotomayor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
Mmmmmmm.....Sonia's gonna owe Michelle bigtime. I wonder how Sonia will payback Michelle? After all "a wise Latina's rulings" would be better than those of a white male (/snic).

What Obama and Michelle Believe re Aborted Babies Born Alive
FR POSTED http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2253212/posts?page=6

In February 2004, US Senate candidate Barack Obama's wife, Michelle, sent a fund-raising letter with the "alarming news" that "right-wing politicians" had passed a law (prohibiting doctors from stabbing half-born babies in the neck with scissors, suctioning out their brains and crushing their skulls). Michelle Obama called partial-birth abortion "a legitimate medical procedure. " She urged supporters to pay $150 to attend a fund-raising luncheon for her husband, who she promised would fight against "cynical ploy[s]" to stop it. BACKGROUND Legislation was presented on the federal level and in various states called the Born Alive Infants Protection Act. It stated all live-born babies were guaranteed the same constitutional right to equal protection, whether or not they were wanted. BAIPA sailed through the U.S. Senate by unanimous vote. Even Sens. Clinton, Kennedy and Kerry agreed a mother's right to "choose" stopped at her baby's delivery. The bill also passed overwhelmingly in the House. NARAL went neutral on it. Abortion enthusiasts publicly agreed that fighting BAIPA would appear extreme. President Bush signed BAIPA into law in 2002. But in Illinois, the state version of BAIPA repeatedly failed, thanks in large part to then-state Sen. Barack Obama. Obama worried aloud that legislation protecting live aborted babies might infringe on women's rights or abortionists' rights. In 2003, as chairman of the next Senate committee to which BAIPA was sent, Obama stopped it from even getting a hearing, shelving it to die much like babies were still being shelved to die in Illinois hospitals and abortion clinics. BAIPA passed in 2005.........after Obama left.

1 posted on 06/04/2009 6:27:29 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Liz
Humble beginnings? Well that describes 99% of Americans right there.

NEXT!

2 posted on 06/04/2009 6:28:13 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Bigots unite!!!


3 posted on 06/04/2009 6:28:18 AM PDT by Tarpon (You abolish your responsibilities, you surrender your rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Limbaugh yesterday, tongue-in-cheek, supported Sotomayor saying as a Roman Catholic, she might turn out to be the stealth anti abortion justice on the court that could overturn Roe v Wade.

interesting


4 posted on 06/04/2009 6:32:42 AM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

we are witnessing a very sharp piece of triangulation from Rush Limbaugh on this. By indicating that he could support her IF she turns out to be pro-life, he has raised the hackles of the far-left nutroots, who will likely turn on her with a vengeance. (to a degree it is already happening due to her being the court’s 6th. Catholic). Either they will take the nomination down, OR she will be forced to make a very forceful and unambiguous pro-choice statement, which will energize Conservatives. Brilliant job by El Rushbo to flush her out of the tall grass.


5 posted on 06/04/2009 6:34:45 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
One harsh assessment of Sotomayor criticized her ideology, her judicial temperament and her fiery temper. “There's a character problem. There's a temperament problem that. She is more of an advocate than an impartial decider of the law." With such lingering questions about Sotomayor's record, Sen Lindsay Graham (R-SC) said he probably would not vote for her.

COMMENTS She is completely absent the necessary judicial temperament---the valuable "judicial gravitas." CBS Evening News pointed that up ...as well as her Achilles heel.......her preoccupation with latinoism.

REFERENCE CBS Evening News caught her offguard---sitting at the side of a Sen (Leahy?). She had clearly been coached------ CBS (bless 'em) explicitly pointed out that she and the Senators were mouthing the same language. Someone off-camera asked her if she was racist. Her visage quickly changed from a smiling senorita to that of a raging bull. CBS kept the camera trained on her. She was furious that gringos were not "respecting" her. Her lips actually moved but no sound came out.... Katie Couric's voice-over clearly noted that, as well.

She is an advocate obsessed with redressing latino grievances from the bench. We are in danger of losing our rule of law, our distinctive American culture, and our very identities as Americans. Americans will lose our freedoms as payback for all those Frito Bandito commercials.

We need to see her emails and phone records to determine who controls her and whether she has contacts with foreign governments.

6 posted on 06/04/2009 6:34:55 AM PDT by Liz (When people fear govt, we have tyranny; when govt fears the people, we have freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I heard an audio interview with HolyO about this subject, and when he called those living babies ‘previable fetuses’ I knew he was demon possessed and had no right to be in the White House since he didn’t believe that these little Americans had rights as well. >:-(

Wonder how many babies he and Michelle aborted during their careers before they decided to keep those two girls probably only for appearances’ sakes??? >:-(


7 posted on 06/04/2009 6:37:05 AM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
MICHELLE GOES TO BAT FOR SONIA

[flapflapflapflapflapflapflap...]

8 posted on 06/04/2009 6:38:02 AM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I was half listening to Rush last night on Hannity.......I couldn’t figure out what the heck he was trying to do......if she would just come out prolife I could support her whole heartedly...or some such nonsense. flush em out huh? good idea.


9 posted on 06/04/2009 6:39:24 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I thought the same thing watching Rush on Glenn Beck last night - brilliant move. Pelosi must be wetting her pants wondering if she is being blindsided by a pro-life Catholic. I personally don’t think Soda is pro-life but I have no proof - just can’t imagine Zero even considering her unless he knows something.


10 posted on 06/04/2009 6:42:17 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Liz
No matter who they send out to promote Sotomayor you cannot white wash the fact that she is a racist and that her finding have been over ruled many times.

She will swear to follow the Constitution until confirmed but like BO she will be lying.

Her humble beginnings do not entitle her to a seat on the Supreme Court.

Clarence Thomas came from much humbler beginnings. He never used those beginnings to further his rise to his present position of a seat on the Supreme Court.

11 posted on 06/04/2009 6:43:02 AM PDT by Dustbunny ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. " Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
We are witnessing a very sharp piece of triangulation from Rush Limbaugh.....indicating that he could support her IF she turns out to be pro-life....he has raised the hackles of the far-left nutroots, who will likely turn on her with a vengeance. Either they will take the nomination down, OR she will be forced to make a very forceful and unambiguous pro-choice statement, which will energize Conservatives. Brilliant job by El Rushbo to flush her out of the tall grass.

Heh---beautiful. Baiting the left---that's my fave sport.

Would be a great tactic at her hearings---baiting her to get her infamous temper out in the open.

Maybe they could get someone to dress up as the Frito Bandito to sit in the audience? ROTFLOL.

12 posted on 06/04/2009 6:43:09 AM PDT by Liz (When people fear govt, we have tyranny; when govt fears the people, we have freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Rush is brilliant, and he is going to force their hand on this! If she says she is pro-life because of her religious faith, Rush can point out that yes, Roe v. Wade can finally be overturned because it is bad law, and send this back to the states where the VOTERS can decide what they want to do about it, as it should be! Of course PP and Naral will have a cow--but in this freedom of information age, I'd like to see more details of exactly what happens during PBB go out to the country ad nauseum so that people realize it for the lie it is! And by all means use this info on MOBO to promote it! "Previable fetuses" should be the word of the day in HolyO's own voiceover, while showing actual pictures to the American public...time to stop grossing out and being delicate and forcing people to face the facts!!

If she comes out pro-death/abortion for innocent unborn/preborn citizens of the United States, he can point out the hypocrisy of her so-called Catholic faith (like Pelosi, Kerry, Kennedy who all PROMOTE abortion, the big fat CINOs!!) and again, point out her EMOTIONALISM (maybe she's a PMS victim since she's so emotional?! That won't help her be a good justice, LOL!)

I saw Hannity's interview with Rush last night and it was a pleasure and delight to watch a master at work--praying for Rush's safety because he is putting himself in the sights of his (and our) enemies--may be uncover many many of the deceptions that HolyO and his cronies are perpetrating on the American people, who'd better WAKE UP ALREADY!!
13 posted on 06/04/2009 6:44:17 AM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
I heard Rush say that.

I almost think he is trying to stir up the Pro-Choice bunch with that statement.

14 posted on 06/04/2009 6:45:29 AM PDT by Dustbunny ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. " Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

and some of the media ran with it before his show was even over. Which is what he wanted them to do, I think


15 posted on 06/04/2009 6:52:38 AM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <----go there now,----> tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; Buckeye McFrog; Condor51; Just mythoughts; Salvation; Calpernia; NYer; ...
Pelosi must be wetting her pants wondering if she is being blindsided by a pro-life Catholic USSC nominee.........

LOL----the mental pic you created of Pelosi is priceless.

I would love to see the expression on Rahm-a-Damma-Ding-Dong's face when he realizes Rush painted him into a corner with few really good options.

As Buckeye McFrog posted:" IF Sonia/Soto turns out to be pro-life....he has raised the hackles of the far-left nutroots, who will likely turn on her with a vengeance. Either they will take the nomination down, OR Sonia/Soto will be forced to make a very forceful and unambiguous pro-choice statement, which will energize Conservatives. Brilliant job by El Rushbo to flush her out of the tall grass.

16 posted on 06/04/2009 6:54:55 AM PDT by Liz (When people fear govt, we have tyranny; when govt fears the people, we have freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon
Bigots Butchers unite!!!

There...fixed that for ya...:)

17 posted on 06/04/2009 6:58:49 AM PDT by Salamander (Cursed with Second Sight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pillut48; Liz

Duh, pillut must have thought before he typed, unlike me - I wrote I saw Rush on Beck’s show, when he was really on Hannity - my mistake.


18 posted on 06/04/2009 7:01:45 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pillut48; Buckeye McFrog
If Sonia/Soto says she is pro-life because of her religious faith......Catholic haters PP and Naral will have a cow. If she comes out pro/abortion, Rush can point out her hypocrisy (like fellow Catholics Pelosi, Kerry, Kennedy who PROMOTE abortion).

Rush can then point out that Roe v. Wade can finally be overturned (based on the 14th amendment)......

"Previable fetuses" should be the word of the day in HolyO's own voiceover.....while showing actual pictures and gruesome details of exactly what happens during p/b abortion. Time to force people to face the facts!!

19 posted on 06/04/2009 7:05:38 AM PDT by Liz (When people fear govt, we have tyranny; when govt fears the people, we have freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

I am starting to sicken at the phrase ‘humble beginnings.’ Didn’t most of us have those? There are few Rockefellers and many serfs..


20 posted on 06/04/2009 7:09:35 AM PDT by bboop (obama, little o, not a Real God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson