Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Big_Monkey
Also, I wouldn't call the o-ring theory anything less than a stinging indictment of NASA, it's management and quality control measures as well as several sub-contractors, including Morton-Thiakol.

*ahem* The NASA and Morton-Thiokol engineers refused to sign off on the launch.

They were overridden by NASA and M-T management.

I can't help but think the final decision was driven by the desire to have the Shuttle in orbit for that evening's State of the Union address.

130 posted on 06/06/2009 4:40:08 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 138 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: null and void
"They were overridden by NASA and M-T management."

Yes, I believe that's absolutely correct. I also remember something about Rockwell engineers also expressing some serious concern about the weather conditions with respect to ice and it's effect on the seals.

You are correct to point out and to clarify that it was both NASA and Morton-Thiokol management that insisted that the launch go forward. As to the pressure that felt because of the State of the Union, I'll leave to others to decide. But, I think it's fair to say that the Roger's Commission was equally tough on both NASA and MT's management.

133 posted on 06/06/2009 4:56:28 PM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson