Skip to comments.
US House Passes 'Cash For Clunkers' Bill
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES via CNN ^
| June 09, 2009
| Josh Mitchell
Posted on 06/10/2009 2:39:21 AM PDT by Daffynition
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: Daffynition
This thing sounds A LOT like the gun take-back programs going on around the country.
Why do the vehicles need to be destroyed? What I sanity!!!
The guns that are taken back are also destroyed.
21
posted on
06/10/2009 3:35:06 AM PDT
by
prismsinc
(A.K.A. "The Terminator"!)
To: Daffynition
This thing sounds A LOT like the gun take-back programs going on around the country.
Why do the vehicles need to be destroyed? What insanity!!!
The guns that are taken back are also destroyed.
22
posted on
06/10/2009 3:35:29 AM PDT
by
prismsinc
(A.K.A. "The Terminator"!)
To: Daffynition
Yeah, but what if your old clunker gets 30mpg like my ‘95 Jetta?
23
posted on
06/10/2009 3:35:56 AM PDT
by
raybbr
(It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
To: Daffynition
24
posted on
06/10/2009 3:36:17 AM PDT
by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: Daffynition
If this was to happen, what you have mentioned will become all the rage.
25
posted on
06/10/2009 3:36:33 AM PDT
by
Biggirl
("Live Long And Prosper!"-Mr. Spock:)=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
To: Daffynition
The voucher would be worth $3,500 if the newer vehicle achieved a 4 mpg increase in fuel economy.
A 4 mpg increase in a new vehicle wont be hard to find. Thats going to be a lot of money paid out - wheres it coming from?
26
posted on
06/10/2009 3:37:13 AM PDT
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
To: R. Scott
I’m trying to build a fast truck, I want a gas guzzler
27
posted on
06/10/2009 3:40:49 AM PDT
by
carcraft
(Pray for our Country)
To: Daffynition
That’s why you would want to buy a gas guzzler. Parts will be extremely cheap and easy to find.
28
posted on
06/10/2009 3:40:52 AM PDT
by
oblomov
(Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods. - Mencken)
To: Daffynition
"It's defying the laws of economics and saying we can manufacture enough demand to keep the auto industry afloat," said Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz. He also questioned where Congress would find the money for the program. Congress has sold its souls to the devil himself....that would be the only way to force gubmint mobiles on the people....
29
posted on
06/10/2009 3:46:28 AM PDT
by
cbkaty
(I may not always post...but I am always here......)
To: carcraft
Im watching our local morning news.
The newsreader, with a bright chipper happy tone of voice tells us that The Government is going to give us thousands of dollars to buy a new car - then with a serious tone of voice tells us about Obamas pay as we go plan!
30
posted on
06/10/2009 3:48:42 AM PDT
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
To: TurtleUp
31
posted on
06/10/2009 3:51:00 AM PDT
by
DemforBush
(Somebody wake me when sanity has returned to the nation.)
To: DemforBush
I ain’t buying a Government Motors car PERIOD!
32
posted on
06/10/2009 3:58:15 AM PDT
by
Fred911
(YOU GET WHAT YOU ACCEPT)
To: Fred911
So now they will have to dispose of these vehicles. Since many are made from plastics, they cannot be burned. They cannot be buried, they cannot be dumped in the ocean.
I wonder what the environmental lobby will say about this?
33
posted on
06/10/2009 4:13:20 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Climate change alarmists are Warm-Mongers. Now that's funny right there. I don't care who you are.)
To: EQAndyBuzz
So now they will have to dispose of these vehicles. Since many are made from plastics, they cannot be burned. They cannot be buried, they cannot be dumped in the ocean.Just think of the rammifications.
First, imagine all the collectible cars that would normally be restored that will be destroyed. I know personally that Jeep fans are totally against this.
Second, imagine what all this scrapped material (rubber, plastic, metal) will do to scrap prices for recyclers....it will depress prices, reduce profits and drive some out of business.
Third, before these cars can be recycled, the fluids must be drained from them....who is going to do that and what will it cost? If you REALLY want to recycle them, the plastics, glass, and different alloys of metal must be segregated....who is going to do that?
34
posted on
06/10/2009 4:24:59 AM PDT
by
Erik Latranyi
(Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
To: Daffynition
"the trade-ins have to have been registered and insured for at least the past year. "
Good for those who can plan ahead.
35
posted on
06/10/2009 4:26:26 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
To: R. Scott
The government is just going to print the money for this, of course. Isn’t that how it’s going to pay for everything?
To: EQAndyBuzz
So now they will have to dispose of these vehicles. Since many are made from plastics, they cannot be burned. They cannot be buried, they cannot be dumped in the ocean. Park them in Detroit, like this one. The city is 100% liberal, so they won't be able to afford anything else to park for the next few centuries.
37
posted on
06/10/2009 4:28:58 AM PDT
by
TurtleUp
(So this is how liberty dies - to thunderous applause!)
To: oblomov
You will still see the gas guzzlers still on the road because the parts shops will become big businesses because of the parts.
38
posted on
06/10/2009 4:41:19 AM PDT
by
Biggirl
("Live Long And Prosper!"-Mr. Spock:)=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
To: Biggirl
I have trouble believing that parts from dismantled "clunkers" will be made available to keep similar gas-guzzlers on the road longer. That idea runs contrary to the administration's agenda.
Yeah, the traded-in vehicles will be disassembled (more "busy work" jobs for the UAW?) to prevent them from returning to the road somehow. As for the parts, I expect to see them loaded on freighters and sold as scrap to China.
39
posted on
06/10/2009 4:58:07 AM PDT
by
Charles Martel
("Endeavor to persevere...")
To: Erik Latranyi
If you REALLY want to recycle them, the plastics, glass, and different alloys of metal must be segregated....who is going to do that? The UAW, of course.
40
posted on
06/10/2009 4:59:18 AM PDT
by
Charles Martel
("Endeavor to persevere...")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-124 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson