Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Holocaust Museum shooter von Brunn a 9/11 'truther' who hated 'neo-cons', Bush, McCain
Examiner.com ^ | 6/10/09 | Kathy Shaidle

Posted on 06/10/2009 2:43:22 PM PDT by LdSentinal

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-128 next last
To: SecAmndmt
You never did answer how it was (or why) that the media discovered who the shooter supported in the R primaries, or why a supporter of any political candidate who had committed a violent murder would advertise his support for that candidate. Any speculation on who the shooter supported for dog catcher?

How it was discovered? The Internet allows use to read the alleged shooter's rantings on an electronic bulletin board. This board happened to be in support of Ron Paul. Logic would dictate that the alleged shooter supports Paul, but then again logic and you seem to be at odds with one another.

You better find out and start a thread about that guy too.

Nah, I'll stick to Ron Turd.

61 posted on 06/10/2009 10:47:11 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

I am in no way defending this person. But his ‘prior conviction’ was a complaint about a citizens arrest at the federal reserve to arrest them for treason. Knowing what you know about the federal reserve and the corruption of our government with respect to AIG, the bank ‘bailouts’ and GM, does anyone believe that the federal reserve isn’t committing treason against us?


62 posted on 06/10/2009 10:47:19 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

The media, DK, and HP are breathlessly trying to lend credence to that idiotic right-winged extremist report that Janet Nappy-head at the DHS crafted in April on the heels of the Tea Party’s.


63 posted on 06/10/2009 10:47:20 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Which one is it?

Both.

64 posted on 06/10/2009 10:48:03 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal; SecAmndmt

The Southern Poverty Law center keeps records on private citizens as young as junior high school. The federal government, can’t by law do this, but they have a corrupt relationship with the privacy pirates at SPLC to get information they would normally need to conduct an investigation or get a court order to discover.


65 posted on 06/10/2009 10:50:21 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

It’s not a joking matter.


66 posted on 06/10/2009 10:51:22 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

If you are associated with the Southern Poverty Law center please acknowledge that your posts are not those of an independent thinker.


67 posted on 06/10/2009 10:54:39 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

“How it was discovered? The Internet allows use to read the alleged shooter’s rantings on an electronic bulletin board.”

That’s very very interesting. I wasn’t aware that “bulletin boards” were in widespread use anymore, since the advent of the web. Are you in charge of the investigation? Or are you a Ron Paul supporter? Or a white supremacist? Or just a garden variety know-it-nothing?

“Logic would dictate that the alleged shooter supports Paul”

This thread seems to be about Ron Paul and a white supremacist that you seem to be very familiar with (fan club?). What does your logic tell you now?

“Nah, I’ll stick to Ron Turd.”

TMI!


68 posted on 06/10/2009 10:58:46 PM PDT by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
Except that this alleged shooter supported Ron Turd for president.

You've provided no credible evidence of that...a spam posting on a Yahoo! Groups list, a post that doesn't even reference Paul is not evidence. Such a claim lacking in evidence means that you are a liar.

Even if he had in some way "supported" some candidate, it would be irrelevant since the candidate is not responsible for unsolicited actions of others. Suppose it turns out that Brunn actually voted for McCain/Palin...your idiot "logic" would mean that Brunn's actions should be held against Palin and all her supporters.

And most Freepers don't believe that 9/11 was an "inside job" and hate Jews.

And Ron Paul, and most of his supports, didn't believe that either.

Ron Turd routinely supports terrorist organizations such as Hamas over Israel.

A repeated LdUrineal lie.

Perhaps you will see the Swastika that will be sure to be inscribed on Ron Turd's gravestone.

Sounds like a terrorist threat here...you may have something in common with Brunn.

And since you've slimed me for being a Paul delegate, which stands-for-nothing candidate were you a delegate for...or did you just hurl insults at Paul from your computer on FR?

69 posted on 06/10/2009 10:58:57 PM PDT by Inappropriate Laughter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt
That’s very very interesting. I wasn’t aware that “bulletin boards” were in widespread use anymore, since the advent of the web. Are you in charge of the investigation? Or are you a Ron Paul supporter? Or a white supremacist? Or just a garden variety know-it-nothing?

Good grief. You're writing on an electronic bulletin board right now. It's terrific that you survived that partial-birth abortion, but it seems to have made you a Ron Turd fanatic.

This thread seems to be about Ron Paul and a white supremacist that you seem to be very familiar with (fan club?). What does your logic tell you now?

That you're an idiot. The insane ramblings of the alleged shooter indicated he's a Paul supporter.

Get it? Good boy, have a cookie.

70 posted on 06/10/2009 11:03:06 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal; Inappropriate Laughter

Apparently LdSentinal is not an independent thinker but is here to support the position of the Southern Poverty Law center which receives tax incentives among other perquisites to collect data on private citizens including children!, and give it to the federal government which allows the federal government to skirt a number of privacy protections afforded by the US Constitution.


71 posted on 06/10/2009 11:04:42 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Wasted bandwidth in this particular thread.


72 posted on 06/10/2009 11:05:44 PM PDT by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Enter Alinsky! The Southern Poverty Law Center school of posting.


73 posted on 06/10/2009 11:06:16 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Inappropriate Laughter
You've provided no credible evidence of that...a spam posting on a Yahoo! Groups list, a post that doesn't even reference Paul is not evidence. Such a claim lacking in evidence means that you are a liar.

Yes it does. Would Ron Paul supporters be posting on a Obama or McCain site or a Ron Paul site? More likely the latter. If you can't see that then you're 3 brain cells are not functioning again.

As for assertion that the alleged shooter voted for McCain/Palin, it would be doubtful since his Internet writings indicate a deep hatred of McCain.

And since you've slimed me for being a Paul delegate, which stands-for-nothing candidate were you a delegate for...or did you just hurl insults at Paul from your computer on FR?

Ooh, the moronic newbie gets his feelings hurt. Boo Hoo. Congrats on being a Ron Turd delegate. I see that most of Turd's delegate are escapees from an insane asylum.

74 posted on 06/10/2009 11:07:40 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt

I suppose you’re right. But no time like the present to expose the Southern Poverty Law Center to those who may not yet have heard of their anti-American slant.


75 posted on 06/10/2009 11:07:56 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

You’re a regular Sherlock Holmes/Columbo.


76 posted on 06/10/2009 11:08:41 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
Ooh, the moronic newbie gets his feelings hurt. Boo Hoo. Congrats on being a Ron Turd delegate.

Every conservative knows about the Alinsky method.
77 posted on 06/10/2009 11:08:57 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

I’m ashamed for you.


78 posted on 06/10/2009 11:10:02 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Ahhh, I bet this never gets out via the lamestream media.</l>


79 posted on 06/10/2009 11:10:43 PM PDT by TheThinker (America doesn't have a president. It has a usurper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Ditto.


80 posted on 06/10/2009 11:10:52 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson