***I didn’t understand your bit about one canceling out the other. Which one is canceling which other?***
You previously made a statement to the effect that one religion’s claims cancels out another’s. Therefore I brought up an analogy which to me amounts to the same level of error that your statement has.
That is what I didn’t understand. How does your analogy work?
The videos, one is about a dog that sees another dog hit by a car on the highway, and then uses its forelimbs to grip the injured animal to drag it to the safety of the kerb. The video was caught by CCTV surveillance cameras, in Chile.
The other is about a leopard finding an infant chimp in the carcass of its mother, and the leopard begins to look after it. This video, was from the National Geographic.