Palin E-mails Show Infighting With Staff

CBS News ^ | July 1, 2009 | Scott Conroy & Susshannah Walshe

[gimme1ibertee]

ROTFL! Good one! I love it!

[gimme1ibertee]

More PDS from the POS that is the “media”.

[steve-b]

Sucession?

Er, if you're talking about the AIP stuff, it's spelled "secession".

[steve-b]

McCain couldn’t even get even with Letterman himself; he had to let the woman do it for him.

[steve-b]

The Party that Todd Palin belonged to is a protest party, a "white version" of La Raza.

I wouldn't vote for somebody tied to La Raza, either.

[ReneeLynn]

Steve did you really have to correct the spelling? Really? Was it an uncontrollable impulse? :P

[WhyisaTexasgirlinPA]

Another day, another hit piece on Sarah.... one more then do we get the weekend off?

[RobbyS]

Well. the politics are “the race” are different. The Independence part really just wants Alaska to enjoy full status with the test of the state rather than remain a quasi-territory.

[American in Israel]

McCain was never meant to win, Sarah almost blew that for them. Nobody expected the average American to respond so strongly. Almost threw the election. If they had not held that lady down and gaged her, the election would have turned out differently, wasting millions of dollars invested in Acorn and other Democratic vote fixing schemes.

These letters just prove what we all expected, this election was rigged.

[70times7]

I asked for an explanation, but you seem to want to pick a fight because we disagree. Go back and read the article.

It is sometimes necessary to drop a matter because the battle will accomplish nothing and may cause much more damage than the original assertion. That is the central issue of the advice Palin was given. She was also informed that her explanation was disparate with public facts.

If you don't grasp these issues, particularly the first one, it would suggest you may not be capable of participating in a reasoned discussion of the topic.

[jla]

I'll try again and you can cease with that pretentious attitude. I "grasp" things just fine.

From the top:

1. So acquiescing is "sound advice"? Just sucking it up and ignoring being misrepresented and/or smeared is "sound advice"?

2. Please expound on what "judgment problems" you believe she has. Sounds to me that she's a stickler for the truth. A fine trait I'd say.

490 states: "I like Palin, but I'm on the fence as far as a potus run and this article is not helping me out (yes, I know that's the point, thanks) but if the write up is accurate, that doesn't matter to me."

"I like Palin, but..."
This gets tiresome.

[70times7]

Hit piece and pimping future attack dog book

Agreed.

Now please explain how that invalidates my concern. It doesn't.

It casts doubt on the author's conclusions and suggests a slanted presentation. But my concerns are primarily with the emails themselves. Even Palin finally recognized that the matter needed to be dropped, but it took a surprising amount of push back to get her there.

[70times7]

As I said, if you don’t (or will not) grasp these issues, particularly the first one, it would suggest you may not be capable of participating in a reasoned discussion of the topic. You are right; it’s tiresome. So I will not discuss it with you.

[70times7]

On the other hand, this whole article may have intentionally left out key facts.

That's what I would prefer to think, but even the bodys of the emails are problematic. It's difficult to say. With all of the garbage being shoveled toward her family I respect her wanting to fight back, but not at the expense of what is true (and easily found out). That's why I think the advice was an obvious fit.

[jla]

Either answer the questions or piss off.

[70times7]

LMAO - reading comprehension is not a strong suit w/ you, is it?

[jla]

reading comprehension is not a strong suit w/ you, is it?

It is when I'm reading a book by someone I admire, such as Dickens or von Mises.
Comments from abject cretins I tend to skim over and forget about quickly. :^)

[70times7]

Yeah, I bet the occasional drawings of miss Haversham are just etched right into your memory, and supply/demand graphs knock around in your empty head like she did in her house.

[LibLieSlayer]

Because yor opinion about the emails is wrong.

LLS

[rrrod]

the Dc Republicans are trying to destroy palin...and the conservative base. Make no mistake any money sent to the RNC, Senate or House re-election committees will be used AGAINST her. keep that in mind when they call for a donation.