Is the low life media trying to attack her still? Yes. But in this instance, provided the key issues are correct, this exchange suggests that she has judgement problems.
I like Palin, but I'm on the fence as far as a potus run and this article is not helping me out (yes, I know that's the point, thanks) but if the write up is accurate, that doesn't matter to me.
If the write up is accurate then Palin took Schimdt’s advice and dropped the matter.
So acquiescing is "sound advice"? Just sucking it up and ignoring being misrepresented and/or smeared is "sound advice"?
Is the low life media trying to attack her still? Yes. But in this instance, provided the key issues are correct, this exchange suggests that she has judgment problems.
Please expound on what "judgment problems" you believe she has. Sounds to me that she's a stickler for the truth. A fine trait I'd say.
I like Palin, but I'm on the fence as far as a potus run and this article is not helping me out (yes, I know that's the point, thanks) but if the write up is accurate, that doesn't matter to me.
Uh-uh.
“Excerpt:
The tension between Alaska Governor Sarah Palin and top McCain campaign aides in the closing days of last fall’s presidential campaign is elucidated in a profile in the new issue of Vanity Fair. CBS News’ Scott Conroy and special contributor Shushannah Walshe, who are writing a book about Palin, reveal just one example of how the mutual frustrations went even further than what has been disclosed so far...”
Hit piece and pimping future attack dog book. You are wrong.
LLS
I agree with you on this. I would love to wholeheartedly jump on the Sarah bandwagon, but, in this case it sounds like she was either shading the truth or she just didn’t remember correctly what the AIP was all about. Either way, Schmidt’s advice was sound. On the other hand, this whole article may have intentionally left out key facts.