“McCain-Lieberman cap-and-trade?
McCain-Kennedy amnesty for illegals?
McCain-Feingold campaign-finance reform?
Supporting al-Qaeda terrorists in Kosovo and Albania?
Bailing out the big New York banks?
Calling Obama “a decent man”?
Leaving hundreds of U.S. POWs to rot in Vietnam and shutting down efforts to rescue them?
Taking bribes and kickbacks from bankers during the S&L crisis in the ‘80s?”
And yet we pushed him to the forefront and made him our candidate. It’s remarkable to me. Given all that he stood for, how on earth could Sarah Palin have agreed to be on HIS ticket??? Oh well, unless she comes out against a “path to citizenship” she won’t get my vote either. Sadly, far too many are willing to overlook was seems to be few if any differences between them and will attempt to shove her to the front. Surely we can find someone who embodies ALL that we’re looking for....including NO amnesty.
Psh. If you listen to some Freepers, it's not just finding "someone who embodies ALL that we're looking for." It's about finding someone who's that, and has charisma, and is popular, and is "viable" (of course, that last part is very subjective).
Never mind the fact that elections should not be mere popularity contests but should be literally, hiring decisions for capable and competent leaders and managers.