Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fatez

<<They have had a real problem managing growth, now they will have to start managing an aging and shrinking population.

I’m pretty sure the entire goal of their one-child policy was to stifle or even reverse population growth. China, despite all the media hype, is still pretty poor and has all sorts of problems associated with overpopulation - not enough food or fresh water, too much garbage and pollution, lots of environmental destruction, crowded and dirty cities, lack of services, etc. Although cruel and immoral, throttling population growth probably prevented China from going down the same path as most African countries with their gigantic population growth and absolutely chaotic social, political, and living conditions.


11 posted on 07/08/2009 12:34:50 AM PDT by too_cool_for_skool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: too_cool_for_skool

Yep that was the goal and they acheived it, but the management of population decrease can be worse than increase. Who pays for the retirement of all parents and grandparents? We in the US are about to find out and that is with slight population growth.


12 posted on 07/08/2009 8:00:55 AM PDT by fatez ("If you're going through Hell, keep going." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson