Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judicial Watch Asks Court to Declare Clinton Constitutionally Ineligible to Serve as Sec. of State
Judicial Watch ^ | 08 July 2009 | Judicial Watch

Posted on 07/08/2009 9:36:54 AM PDT by BGHater

Files New Motion in Lawsuit on Behalf of State Department Foreign Service Officer

Contact Information:
Press Office 202-646-5172, ext 305


Washington, DC -- July 8, 2009

Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that on July 2 it filed a motion with a special panel of three federal judges in the District of Columbia asking the court to declare Hillary Clinton ineligible to serve as Secretary of State. The Judicial Watch lawsuit, filed on behalf of a U.S. Foreign Service Officer and State Department employee David C. Rodearmel, maintains that the "emoluments clause" of the U.S. Constitution prohibits Mrs. Clinton from serving as Secretary of State until January 2013, and that Mr. Rodearmel cannot be forced to serve under the former U.S. Senator, as it would violate the oath he took as a Foreign Service Officer in 1991 to "support and defend" and "bear true faith and allegiance" to the Constitution of the United States (Rodearmel v. Clinton, et al., (D. District of Columbia)).

Government lawyers had previously filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. Judicial Watch filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss, as well as a "cross motion for summary judgment."

According to Article I, Section 6 of the U.S. Constitution: "No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been encreased during such time." The text of the provision is an absolute prohibition and does not allow for any exceptions. However, as noted in the motion, "the 'compensation and other emoluments' of the office of the U.S. Secretary of State increased during Mrs. Clinton's tenure in the U.S. Senate, including as many as three times during the second, six-year term to which she was elected."

Congress attempted to circumvent this constitutional provision by "rolling back" compensation for the position of Secretary of State to the level in effect on January 1, 2007, when Mrs. Clinton's second term in the Senate began. The motion maintains: "This [fix] does not and cannot change the historical fact that the 'compensation and other emoluments' of the office of the U.S. Secretary of State increased during Mrs. Clinton's tenure in the U.S. Senate." Judicial Watch also notes that throughout the nation's history, "the Ineligibility Clause was readily understood and applied consistent with its plain language." Only relatively recently have government officials attempted to get around this constitutional provision through legislative quick fixes.

"Congress must not be allowed to do an end run around the U.S. Constitution," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "Hillary Clinton is ineligible to serve as Secretary of State until 2013. The Constitution is crystal clear on this point. We hope the court puts a stop to this naked attempt to circumvent the Constitution in the name of political expediency."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhostatedept; clinton; constitution; judicialwatch; secretaryofstate; soshillary; unfit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: BGHater

Judicial Watch’s fund raising must be hurting. Time to sucker naive conservatives with more pointless red-meat lawsuits. “Yes. We are going to stop Hilary. So keep those dollars coming folks!”


21 posted on 07/08/2009 10:33:22 AM PDT by Seruzawa (Obamalama lied, the republic died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

For later


22 posted on 07/08/2009 10:41:19 AM PDT by Salvation (With God all things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
'Judicial Watch Asks Court to Declare Hillary Clinton Constitutionally Ineligible to Serve as Secretary of State'

It would have more fitting if they had included PINO, the illegal alien and usurper occupying the White House, circumventing the Constitution!!!

23 posted on 07/08/2009 11:16:24 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huebolt; JohnG45
The FBI & Supreme Court do not seem to be on the side of the people.

It might be of some help if the spineless Republicans would take a stand for us. Sadly, I think we are on our own.

24 posted on 07/08/2009 12:31:21 PM PDT by LADY J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TChris

Sure seems to be that way. Jacko’s funeral seems far more interesting to the media and public than truly important issues.


25 posted on 07/08/2009 2:44:40 PM PDT by tips up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa
I always liked a description of Judicial Watch which I used to see here:

Judicial Watch is like Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson with a law degree

.

26 posted on 07/08/2009 3:30:09 PM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson