From that statement it is not clear what you intend. Defense is great. Offensive offense we can do without.
Our side did very well against Letterman. We need to be outraged but not offensive"
Why is my statement about the mister nice guy crap is getting to be over the top is not being read as the way it was stated?
It's a truthful statement. Our side - including, during President Bush's Presidency has been to sit back & be the nice guys. I see that got us a big pay off!!!!
I am not understanding what you mean by what do I intend to do about it??
I thought I made it clear that I will not be silent any longer while we get pummeled with lies & pretended outrage. I'm wondering what you find so wrong about that?
What exactly did I say that you found "Offensive offense" that you can do without?
Apparently you are late to the party. Most freepers aren't silent.
What I am saying is that you were not clear on what action that you intended to take.
Why is my statement about the mister nice guy crap is getting to be over the top is not being read as the way it was stated?
Because this does not clearly state your intended actions. It simply says that you are tired of being "A nice guy". Subsequent actions can take many forms. You have now cleared that up. It isn't your intention to emulate the left.