Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson
But the writer has a point. We should steer clear of Obama's children.

Like the left has refrained from bashing Sara Palin's children? C'mon Jim. They can do it and we can't?

AFAIK, they are a bunch of sorry-a$$ed whiners. The 1st Amendament is OK when they use it to advance their pathetic opinions, but everyone else needs to abide by their rules? No, sorry.

272 posted on 07/10/2009 1:41:57 PM PDT by Sarajevo (You jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sarajevo
No, sorry.

I'm sitting here laughing. How well do you think it will work when you tell the sites owner that you won't obey his rule? LOLOL

279 posted on 07/10/2009 2:02:48 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies ]

To: Sarajevo
Like the left has refrained from bashing Sara Palin's children? C'mon Jim. They can do it and we can't?

We think the nasty comments made about Sarah Palin's children are reprehensible. If we claim that those comments shouldn't be made, why should we make them about That One's kids?

I don't believe turn about is fair play when it comes to kids.

Now I'll comment about That One's idiotic behavior and Michelle's dumpy clothing, when she's raised up as some sort of fashion icon by the MSM, all day long, but I WON'T bring their kids into the discussion, except to compliment them about their clothing, or defend their travels with their parents. THEY are not the issue. That One's destruction of our country is.

400 posted on 07/10/2009 7:26:30 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson