[Caramelgal]

It is not a ridiculous quibble and to claim it absolutely untrue is not honest. It is simply a fact that you wish to ignore. Please read George Ellis' quote again. There are no scientific models, only philosphical ones.

Interesting that you post this this week when we are remembering the Apollo 16 landing on the Moon 40 years ago.

For your geocentric model to be accurate, or just as accurate and valid as a heliocentric model, perhaps you also count yourself among those who think the Moon landing was staged on a Hollywood set and that Neil Armstrong and all the NASA scientists and astronauts are out and out liars and party to some vast conspiracy? You’d have to believe that in order to believe in heliocentrisim.

metmom: do you still deny that there are heliocentric creationists posting on this site and that you have no knowledge of who they are? Are you willing to call them out for their errors? Or do you also buy into their “lunacy”.

[metmom]

For your geocentric model to be accurate, or just as accurate and valid as a heliocentric model, perhaps you also count yourself among those who think the Moon landing was staged on a Hollywood set and that Neil Armstrong and all the NASA scientists and astronauts are out and out liars and party to some vast conspiracy? You’d have to believe that in order to believe in heliocentrisim.

Predictable as the sunrise.

metmom: do you still deny that there are heliocentric creationists posting on this site and that you have no knowledge of who they are? Are you willing to call them out for their errors? Or do you also buy into their “lunacy”.

Now you're dragging *heliocentric creationists* into it? What's the matter? Having too much trouble discrediting geocentric creationists?

I just love how evos have such a grasp of what it is that they think that creationists believe, or have to believe if they are to be *real* creationists. It gets more and more outlandish with each passing week.

As creationists shoot down the ridiculous caricatures evos try to put forth as representative of creationism, they are forced into a position of reaching further and further into the absurd to try to find something to use against us.

I'll tell you what. It's not creationists who are looking ridiculous here.

[editor-surveyor]

"For your geocentric model to be accurate, or just as accurate and valid as a heliocentric model..."

Wanting to look just as foolish as AMD?

If Al Einstein buys it, why would anyone make such a stink to deny it?

You're a real piece of work yourself!

[GourmetDan]

"For your geocentric model to be accurate, or just as accurate and valid as a heliocentric model, perhaps you also count yourself among those who think the Moon landing was staged on a Hollywood set and that Neil Armstrong and all the NASA scientists and astronauts are out and out liars and party to some vast conspiracy?"

Do you seriously believe that NASA used a heliocentric model to send men to the moon?

What utter stupidity!