> How do we reconcile this action with the objectors who refused their duty claiming that Bush was selected-not-elected, or that Iraq was an illegal war?
Easy. The process that elected Bush was transparent, as was the process that put US troops into Iraq. People didn’t like it, and they didn’t have to like it, but it was transparent.
There has been no transparency surrounding Obama’s eligibility. No process has been followed. People don’t like it and unfortunately the Constitution says that people have to like it in order for it to be valid.
Let’s see the Birth Certificate, please.
Just as Roe v. Wade is the law of the land, though we know there are no penumbras and emanations in the Constitution...so is Obama the defacto POTUS.
I hate it, and it's possibly a suicide dose, but there it is.
65 million idiots voted FOR him, the opposing party conceded, 300 million Americans tacitly watched his inauguration, the outgoing POTUS validated him and the Chief Justice of the USSC capped it off with a handshake,... he is POTUS.
It is unreasonable to expect a single ruling from a lower court to somehow overturn all the above...even if he is found out.
Let’s see the Birth Certificate, please.
That horse has left the barn, probably forever.
We've been living in a post-constitutional judicial oligarchy since 1973.