To: kellynla
However, the fact that the U.S. Army revoked the orders of a soldier about to be sent overseas based wholly upon such a claim is unprecedented. And there were reports that the Army pressured a company to fire Mr. Cook. This silly birth certificate story is producing a lot of smoke.
13 posted on
07/17/2009 5:54:22 AM PDT by
Always Right
(Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
To: Always Right
41 posted on
07/17/2009 6:03:07 AM PDT by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: Always Right; kellynla
It would probably be the correct thing for the Army to advise the company that Major Cook's security clearance had been revoked, and simply to remind the company that no one without such a clearance may work on their contracts...
...but the reports I've heard seem to suggest the Army (at someone's behest?) did more than that.
HF
93 posted on
07/17/2009 6:16:49 AM PDT by
holden
To: Always Right; All
409 posted on
07/17/2009 10:48:36 AM PDT by
Jacksonian Grouch
(God has granted us Freedom; we owe Him our courage in return)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson