But but but the rocks are all supposed to be the same age as the fossils they are found in therefore the crevasse could not be older than the age the dinosaur was living in.
Otherwise the dating of fossils by the age of the rocks and the dating of the rocks by the type of fossils found in them would be WRONG!
Otherwise the dating of fossils by the age of the rocks and the dating of the rocks by the type of fossils found in them would be WRONG!
Exactly. I'm betting the evos will say that there's other "processes" that could result in fossils being surrounded by rocks older than the ones they initially walked on, and they probably have some fancy-schmancy names to explain the failure of what should be a simple theory. If the dinosaur lived during a time, it should be dated to that time - it's not that complicated!! How many "do-overs" to the evos think they get, anyway?
Creationists stick to their guns, and are proven correct with each new discovery, while evolutionism slowly withers away. The "discrepancy" in ages is obviously evidence of a younger earth with dinosaurs living concurrently with more modern species.
If Tyrannosaurs walked the earth for so long (like 50 million years), how come they didn't evolve into something else? Right there, simple common sense destroys evolutionism in its tracks.
Yet gubmint skools still teach this nonsense in place of the purely rational discipline of creation science. It's time for Christians to take (peaceful but aggressive) measures to change this.