The two movements are very much parallel in their aims.
Both anthropomorphic global warming econuts, and Darwin Derangement Syndrome antievolutionists, want the same thing. They both want textbooks and curricula to effectively lie to students about the current status of professional scientific debate.
Econuts want curricula to present the AGW view as having scientifically prevailed, when it has not; when in truth competing views about the causes and nature of global warming remain strong and viable, and have advocates producing relevant, original and ongoing research substantively advancing such views. They want this objective truth suppressed and replaced with a lie.
Antievolutionists want curricula to pretend that evolution has not prevailed in scientific debate, and to present antievolutionary views as viable scientific alternatives, when (at least to date) they are not, and when no antievolutionists are producing relevant, original and ongoing research substantively advancing such views. They want this objective truth suppressed and replaced with a lie.
Even a child gets that algore has more in common with the evolutionists than he does the creationists. A small child.
Like I said, what’s next...algore the evangelist?