Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul: Obama Will "Destroy the Dollar"
Real Clear Politics ^ | 7/17/09

Posted on 07/18/2009 9:33:27 AM PDT by FromLori

Congressman and two-time presidential candidate Ron Paul tells Newsmax the economic stimulus plan is a "total failure," and he's pushing a bill requiring the Federal Reserve to disclose its dealings so Americans can find out who the "culprits" are behind the financial meltdown.

The Texas Republican also said the U.S. is on course to "destroy the dollar," the healthcare reform plan is "dangerous" and could bankrupt the nation — and he is fighting against those who "would socialize the country."

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; agenda; bho44; dollar; federalreserve; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: exist

Annoying because they were knew they were right?

Annoying because they were passionate?

Good criteria to dismiss a candidate. That’s how we end up with fools like Obama and fiscal RINO’s like the Bushes.


21 posted on 07/18/2009 10:22:53 AM PDT by Onerom99 (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

LOL. What can the secretary of treasury do?

As President he could veto every single piece of government expansion that comes along his desk.

You Paul-haters are just an absolute joke.


22 posted on 07/18/2009 10:24:37 AM PDT by Onerom99 (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: exist

Not nearly as bad as Palin supporters


23 posted on 07/18/2009 10:44:11 AM PDT by MadIsh32 (In order to be pro-market, sometimes you must be anti-big business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NeverForgetBataan

http://networkedblogs.com/p7582791


24 posted on 07/18/2009 10:46:16 AM PDT by FromLori (FromLori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FromLori
Ron Paul is a pretty sharp guy. Unfortunately he is more interested in being “correct” and “pure” than being effective. However I vote for him every election since he can be counted on to defend the Constitution and fight against big government spending. He is also very well educated (old school education) on economics issues. The house GOP leadership should listen to Ron Paul on monetary and Constitutions issues as he could be very helpful. Disclaimer, I am not a Paulite, he is my congressman and I like him as a congressman. That's all.
25 posted on 07/18/2009 10:48:31 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Onerom99
You got "Paul hater" out of my post? That's a little dramatic, isn't it?

Are those the kinds of accusations you throw at everyone who doesn't slavishly worship your hero and drink vast amounts of the Kool-Aid?

Get lost, n00b.

26 posted on 07/18/2009 10:50:11 AM PDT by Allegra ( Socks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
"You got "Paul hater" out of my post?"

That is certainly a stretch isn't it. You recommend him for Sec of Treasury and "they" call you a hater! It would take the rubbery guy in the fantastic four to make a stretch like that. lol

27 posted on 07/18/2009 10:54:36 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
Yes, if Onerous99 gets snippy again, I may have to go find Jim Robinson's comment about Paul supporters and remind Onerous99 that his kind aren't exactly welcome here, so he'd better mind his manners. :)
28 posted on 07/18/2009 10:59:34 AM PDT by Allegra ( Socks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: exist

He isn’t saying anything now that he wasn’t saying before. The only difference is that before most people either ignored him or called him crazy.


29 posted on 07/18/2009 11:13:06 AM PDT by frankiep (Ron Paul was right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kempster
“He’s against fiat money when it fits his hand picked agenda. His current agenda doesn’t call for that. Wait a month or two.”

Rep. Paul has been steadfast on ending the private bankers control of our dollar for years and years and has had his name dragged threw the mud as a loon and conspiracy nut for it. He has never flip flopped on this or anything else. His only agenda is to go back to when the dollar was pre-FED (private bankers who charge us interest the second a dollar is printed aka fiat). Our dollar belongs in the hands of our Republic and not in the hands of secret bankers who are mostly foreign.

30 posted on 07/18/2009 11:21:57 AM PDT by Rottweilerson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Onerom99; Allegra; TopQuark; Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Onerom99: Suppose that the paleosurrenderman had actually been elected POTUS because someone put fatal delusional drugs in the water system before election day (maybe they did a test run last November). The armed forces, all dressed up in their colonial tri-cornered hats and knickers and buckled shoes are lined up with their spiffy new blunderbusses (but without ammunition since we would not want to actually harm our enemies). Row boats armed with genuine harpoons with foam rubber tips set off under free market private citizen "captains" armed with little more than "letters of marque and reprisal" are going after our nation's enemies on the high seas (very high considering what they must be smoking to support the surrenderman). What's left of our intelligence services (hampered by every allegedly constitutionalist fantasy of the ACLU) is utterly incapable of predicting that Tuesday is the day after Monday but, hey, where does the constitution allow for intelligence anyway???? 50 state (or is it still 13) governments will each have their own intelligence services, squabbling and competing for who gets the ear of the military.

Why, the surrenderman will be sooooo busy vetoing proposals for new lighthouses (to guide the new sailing ships or rowboats of our new paleonavy) that he won't notice Mohammed el Kaboomski coming up behind him in the oval office to force his surrender and his written agreement to establish and implement Sharia law.

After Paulie grovels on his knees dancing the Islamofascist tune to their delight there won't be much need for the American dollar since we will be living an eleventh century lifestyle swapping pigs for hummus supplies in our terrific new barter economy.

You must be right, Onerom99, no mere Secretary of Treasury spot for the Galveston shrimpin' czar. Only as POTUS, can he veto everything including the very existence of military forces.

In an age of nuclear weapons, he can veto our entire country by sitting in the oval office holding his breath until he turns blue to teach our enemies the Kumbaya foreign policy way. As Islamofascist missiles rain down on our citizens he will at least know that there was no war by Americans when, not only did Congress "declare war," but the POTUS refused to ask for one or fight because war is just sooooo, well, icky!!!!

Are there any planets out there where you guys might be more comfortable. I would personally drive y'all to the soace port. Take the Obamanation and paleoPaulie with you to another planet and I'll rent a limo.

See how far a sound dollar will get you if and when the USA is a radioactive ash heap.

Speaking of jokes, you would actually entrust the fate of te United States and of its people to governance by some paleopacifist wimp like Paul??? We already have Obama and that's bad enough. We don't need the Baghdad Bob of Galveston in Congress much less in the White House. If Obama and his political people thought that the Gakveston House seat could be won by a Demonrat, he would have fired Hillary and hired the paleosurrenderman as his new SOS because Paulie and Obamamessiah are on the same wavelength. Paul could do just as well on a world tour groveling and apologizing for the past and present existence of the USA. Besides, given Paulie's eccentric political career, Obamamessiah could usher in a new era of tripartisanshi*: Demonrat, "Republican" and Libertoonian.

Peace, love and dope, man!

LCSulla: You have FReepmail!

31 posted on 07/18/2009 11:24:36 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: manc

Paul would carry more weight in his comments if he wasn’t a king of pork. One of the more recent spending bills includes 33 million in pork requests from Dr. Paul; where does he think that money comes from?


32 posted on 07/18/2009 11:28:27 AM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
I was very disappointed in the treatment Ron Paul received from a large number of “conservative” outlets. One thing conservatives know how to do par excellencies is making good the enemy of perfect. There is no perfect, there never will be perfect, on most issues Ron Paul is excellent on a few he's terrible. lol. Had he been the GOP nominee I would have voted for him. Only McCain and Rommy were unacceptable to me. I certainly hope those that hated Paul can put that behind them and those that supported Paul can get over it too. It's all water under the bridge and we have the mother of all political battles in front of us now. Worse other then a maybe Sarah Palin we do not have a effective leader. Hopefully Sarah can rise to the occasion cause if she can't we are really screwed.
33 posted on 07/18/2009 11:30:13 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Onerom99

The day Ron Paul apologizes for saying 9/11 was our fault I’ll start listening to him. Until then he’s a kook IMHO. I expect to see Osama’s birth certificate before then though. Yeah you can call me a Ron Paul hater. Until he apologizes. No exceptions.


34 posted on 07/18/2009 11:31:33 AM PDT by McGruff (Paid for by Fred Robinson / Jim Thompson 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn

King of pork, lol, you really can’t be that dumb can you? 33 million for a district that was largely distroyed by hurricane Ike, damn what a king of pork. PS, six of seven houses on my street are gone. Gone, bye, see ya later. And just about every street in my little town is like that.


35 posted on 07/18/2009 11:34:05 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
"The day Ron Paul apologizes for saying 9/11 was our fault I’ll start listening to him"

9/11 was our fault just like Perl Harbor was our fault. Policies have consequences is all Paul was saying. Depriving Japan of natural resource in 1940 lead to war with Japan. Support for Israel (which I support 100%) and invading Iraq (luke warm on that one, particularly since we did not finish the job) lead to war with Islam. That is all Paul was saying. Personally I thought it was a very stupid thing to say, totally unnecessary and totally unwise. Once the enemy is defeated then examine events, not when our troops are on the ground and fighting.

36 posted on 07/18/2009 11:46:08 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn

I never knew that
thanks


37 posted on 07/18/2009 11:49:49 AM PDT by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman , nothing else-- end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Rottweilerson

Isn’t he the one that just said Obama would destroy the dollar. It would seem that he would see that favorably if he was consistent. I agree that it would be great to go back before Jekkyl Island, but the reality is that that will never happen with only one person talking about it in Congress.


38 posted on 07/18/2009 11:50:49 AM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: frankiep
He isn’t saying anything now that he wasn’t saying before. The only difference is that before most people either ignored him or called him crazy.

Actually. Nevermind. HE'S CRAZY AGAIN.

39 posted on 07/18/2009 11:58:40 AM PDT by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: kempster
“Isn’t he the one that just said Obama would destroy the dollar. It would seem that he would see that favorably if he was consistent.”

So what your suggesting is that he wants the dollar destroyed so that maybe he could rebuild it from scratch? I don't think so. There was a dollar before 1913, so he just wants to go back to that.

“I agree that it would be great to go back before Jekkyl Island, but the reality is that that will never happen with only one person talking about it in Congress.”

Check out the Bill to audit the Federal Reserve (HR 1207)which now has 271 co-sponsors in the Congress, so that's at least 270 more Representatives in The House then what you thought. so much for him being the only one talking about it in Congress! pwned.

40 posted on 07/18/2009 12:09:54 PM PDT by Rottweilerson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson