Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Caramelgal
Obviously I disagree. FR is a pro-God, pro-Life, pro-Liberty conservative site. We are biased toward God, Life, Liberty, family and country.

All I'm going to say to you is that FR is what it is and I'm perfectly happy with it just the way it is. Those who don't like it and or think we're being unfair to opposing points of view can take a flying leap at a rolling donut. Because, frankly my dear, I just don't give a damn.


So you disagree that other points of view on the evolution debate are not to be tolerated here? That only a fundamentalist POV is allowed? That the faith of anyone who disagrees with a YEC POV should be called into question and that their “Christianity” is somehow false or faulty?

So in other words Jim, you think it is fine for creationists to insult anyone who disagrees with them, call them mentally retarded or insane, liberal trolls, etc. and to insult conservative Catholics by inferring that they are not “real” Christians, which I understand it against most forum’s rules, and yet when conservative and pro-life Catholics and other Christians object to that depiction based on their belief that the TOE and a 4.5 billion year old Earth is not contrary to their beliefs as Christians, they should not be able to defend themselves?

Although you and others might think otherwise, I am not nor are many other posters here against God, Life, Liberty, family and country just because we believe the Earth is a lot more than 6,000 years old. I’ve been a pro-life, free market, pro-1st and 2nd amendment, constitutional conservative all my life. While I’ve debated on the evolution and other science topics, I’ve tried to be civil and respectful of other’s religious beliefs and that civility is often not reciprocated. But it’s good to know where you stand on the topic and that you think that Christians who think that TOE is valid science or that the Earth is older than 6,000 years are not “true” Christians or “real” conservatives and that according to you, that they are no longer welcome here.

Frankly Jim, you’ve allowed this site to become a cesspool of the fringe. Please remove my account because I no longer want to be associated with Free Republic, for this and many other reasons of late, as you evidently know nothing about “Freedom” or the meaning of the word “Republic”. And quite frankly “my dear”, I don’t give a good damn what you think either.

You should really consider changing the name of this site to “Fundamentalist Republic” as that would be a more honest representation of what this once good, conservative and influential site has become.
192 posted on 07/26/2009 3:04:11 PM PDT by Caramelgal (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]


To: Caramelgal

I have no idea how old the earth is and don’t care one way or the other. But I do know that in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

Cesspool, eh?

Whine, baby, whine.

FreeRepublic.com, kissing the libs and making them whine since 1996.


193 posted on 07/26/2009 3:27:18 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/jimrobfr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

To: Caramelgal
So in other words Jim, you think it is fine for creationists to insult anyone who disagrees with them, call them mentally retarded or insane, liberal trolls,

Ahem,....

The term *creatard* is NOT a creationist construct. Neither is *IDiot*.

They certainly do their share of calling people insane, accuse them of drinking too much, and calling people trolls themselves.

Evos are in no position to whine about insults.

196 posted on 07/26/2009 8:02:52 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

To: Caramelgal

[[Please remove my account]]

Must you leave so soon? I was just about ot poison the tea

[[That the faith of anyone who disagrees with a YEC POV should be called into question and that their “Christianity” is somehow false or faulty?]]

Ya know- it’s not that you or anyone else might dissagree with YEC- it’s HOW you folks dissagree, and the lengths you folks go to to try to derail threads that expose OEC or macroevolution that is the problem- As I mentioend several times now, take a quick glance at GGG’s threads and note the lengths for yourself- there’s NO secret here- it’s the same on EVERY thread he posts- several key evos in particular show up on EVERY thread hoping to disrupt and divert attention from the articles posted and quite frankly it’s tiring- and if you think peopel complaining about that soemhow makes FR a cesspool- then again I state you have a VERY selective sense of outrage

[[I’ve tried to be civil and respectful of other’s religious beliefs and that civility is often not reciprocated.]]

Meh- not so much- You aint fooling anyone- you might not use direct insults, but your subtle insults are just as insidious- Perfect example is found in your following statement “You should really consider changing the name of this site to “Fundamentalist Republic”

Yup- the poor picked on evos- Where did I leave that violin?


200 posted on 07/26/2009 8:29:11 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson