Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Star Traveler
You are right, but it's more than thst. Even the very word "birther," which we should not use or accept. It's an attempt to put us in the loony bin when we are really just looking for the answer.

No one who loves his country should want this search ended. Maybe we will be proven wrong, although we're not (all) sayng he wasn' eligible, we just want proof. I am willing to take the risk of being proven wrong.

55 posted on 07/24/2009 10:05:29 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: firebrand; pissant; devolve; potlatch; LucyT; Polarik; Fred Nerks
You are correct. "Birther" is a Leftist propaganda tool, as is "tea-bagger".

I would prefer that the "baby-killers" call us "constitutionalists".

Article II Section 1 Paragraph 5 requires the president to be a "natural born Citizen".

Something about loyalty in the reasoning of the supporting documents written by the founders.

If anybody is a "birther" it is ali Hussein Lord of All Czars.

By his account he was born in two hospitals. His grandmother is adamant it was a third, in Mombasa, Kenya.

Yet he spends hundreds of thousands of dollars to suppress a ten-dollar document.

He doth protest too much.


58 posted on 07/24/2009 10:15:00 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: firebrand

ST is never right. He/she/it is a very confused individual


61 posted on 07/24/2009 10:23:35 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson