Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wtc911

Actually since you are too lazy to read the thread rather than one post, the cop, the government empoyee, Crowley wasted public resources by making a bad arrest.

We know it is a bad arrest and we know Gates was not breaking the law because charges were dropped immediately when business hours the next day rolled around. When charges can not be sustained, you are not doing your job by arresting someone. So Crowley was wasting the money of the good people of Cambridge mostly likely because his ego got the best of him.

Of course you could have read the entire thread. You could try to think and learn from the discussion. But instead you just name call. Good job.


103 posted on 07/29/2009 7:28:26 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: JLS
Wrong. I read theentire thread. Your basic argument is built on the lie that gates was arrested for voicing his obnoxious opinion. Any argument built on a lie is false throughout.

You compound the lie with this statement...

"We know it is a bad arrest and we know Gates was not breaking the law because charges were dropped immediately when business hours the next day rolled around."

Any ADA can decide not to follow through after an arrest for any number of reasons, political considerations being one. It happens all the time and is not nor is it meant to be a statement from the DA that the arrest was wrongful.

Try working with what is factual in the real world.

104 posted on 07/29/2009 7:35:15 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson