Humans invented the tests, so humans invented the interpretation of the tests, so the result can mean anything humans decide they mean. It’s not like when we arrived on earth we found an owner’s manual waiting for us with a chapter on interpreting tests that we humans developed. We have such an "owner's manual"; it's called the Holy Bible, and it tells us exactly how our history should be interpreted. If a test made by mere humans shows "results" that differ from the default, infallible "owner's manual", well, then there's no need to look any deeper, because the tests are flawed.
Funny that Creation Scientists, who do research honestly, don't run into any of these "problems".
Praise be to Him!
We have such an "owner's manual"; it's called the Holy Bible, and it tells us exactly how our history should be interpreted. If a test made by mere humans shows "results" that differ from the default, infallible "owner's manual", well, then there's no need to look any deeper, because the tests are flawed. Funny that Creation Scientists, who do research honestly, don't run into any of these "problems". They don't have any of these problems because they reject all physics, astronomy, biology and geology.