Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tublecane
-- If it was proposed that foreign-born people be explicitly included among those grandfathered in, I can understand that. I don’t however think it leads to a different take than what I said. --

I do. You maintain that the grandfather clause is necessary. I read the statement of the era as that the grandfather clause was NOT necessary, but was inserted to give some foreign-born people an opportunity to obtain the office of president.

965 posted on 08/01/2009 5:12:18 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 963 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

“You maintain that the grandfather clause is necessary. I read the statement of the era as that the grandfather clause was NOT necessary, but was inserted to give some foreign-born people an opportunity to obtain the office of president.”

But of course it was necessary. Because it didn’t matter if you were born in America or born in England, no one around when the Constitution was ratified was born a U.S. citizen. They might have been born in America, but that’s before there was such a thing as a U.S. citizen. Therefore having any citizen become president, without the grandfather clause, would have violated the natural born clause.

If they had not grandfathered in someone, foreign or locally born, doesn’t matter, no one on earth would have been eligible.


968 posted on 08/01/2009 5:24:37 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 965 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson