Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aquabird
This has already been debunked. That area of Kenya was already calling itself the Republic of Kenya.

It has not been dunked.

Do you have any evidence whatsoever that they ever called themselves this? The best BP came up with so far was that they MAY have called themselves this. He has not yet come up with a single instance of them doing so anywhere, and especially not in official documents or seals. Who was the head of state of the supposed "republic of Kenya"?

If you are asserting that they call themselves "Republic of Kenya" before they even first announced they were moving in that direction in mid august 1964, then you either know something you haven't shared with us or you are pushing a falsehood.

Why else do similar birth certificates at that same time also say ‘Republic of Kenya’?

Once again, either you know something that is not widely known or you are pushing a falsehood. The WND article did not explicitly state that the documents they used for comparison were from before December 1964, nor did the article say it shared the "republic of Kenya" header and official seal.
549 posted on 08/02/2009 9:53:00 PM PDT by Mount Athos (A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies ]


To: Mount Athos

Tee hee, ‘defensive’ are we?

WND said that it got a hold of other birth certificate documents, and said they looked similar. Other birth certificates using a different seal or a different name of the country would certainly qualify as not being ‘similar’. One could argue that WND is stupid, but I think anyone would notice if the name of the nation would be different.

You are right that WND did not explicitly state that other birth certificates use the same ‘Republic of Kenya’. But when the story was written, the writer didn’t know that would be an issue. Or that people would think Lavender was not a person but a soap detergent.

The name of the country is something that is very easily verifiable in documents. The fact that no one is producing such documents showing that Kenya was NOT listing itself as ‘Republic of Kenya’ speaks volumes. This is something that can easily be proven false and no one has done so. The reason why is because they likely can’t.

In other words, the viral messengers need better tactics.

You said:

“Once again, either you know something that is not widely known or you are pushing a falsehood.”

I am an Anti-Viral Messenger. I am their worst nightmare. I can see right through them. Most people can. That is why they hate me.

You have already posted your ‘It was not a Republic’ tripe over and over and over again. You’ve made your point. Move on.

If it is a forgery, it will clearly debunk itself within the next few days especially with something like having a different name for the country.

But if you keep pressing the same exact post over and over again, we will know that you are here with an agenda and are a viral messenger.

BTW, I love when viral messengers post in the middle of the night. They become so obvious posing at 3 AM and all.


569 posted on 08/02/2009 10:16:43 PM PDT by Aquabird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 549 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson