Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LouieFisk

Here is another [possible troll] one time reply on this thread.


Yes, indeed. Do a sprectral analysis of the paper, the ink and the font used. You will most likely find that that paper was created AFTER 1964. The thing is a huge fake, the birther movement is a fake.

If the right wants to beat Obama, then it will have to do it over issues, not over this kind of useless horse doo-doo.

637 posted on Monday, August 03, 2009 3:39:58 AM by bonncaruso (”Carpe Diem”)


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2306755/posts?page=637#637


706 posted on 08/03/2009 6:49:12 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Jimmy Carter - now the second worst POTUS ever. BHO has #1 spot in his sights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 703 | View Replies ]


To: Arrowhead1952

The fact that so many trolls have shown up here in the last day decrying this document as a fake and trying to riducule us into ignoring it is evidence that even those on the left think this is possibly a genuine document.

So far nobody has provided any solid evidence to dispute the document. Only conjecture. There is a book and page number listed where the original record was recorded. If that page documents the birth, then Obama has some explaining to do. If the book and page are fraudulent, then the document is a fraud. If that particular book turns up missing or there are pages ripped out, then that would suggest that the Chicago people got to somebody.

I don’t think it would be that difficult to bribe some low level clerk in Kenya.


716 posted on 08/03/2009 7:04:05 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 706 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson