[LouieFisk]

P-Marlowe - "The only thing that will prove things one way or the other is to look at other documents from the same place at the same time."

Not really. Legally, it has to stand or fall on it's own merits. But it does reference a book which supposedly contains confirming info - if that book exists as a legit source of data, then it would appear to be a slam-dunk genuine document.

[SeattleBruce]

“if that book exists as a legit source of data”
++++++++++++++

So we’re in the same place that we’ve been with the HI BC - the authorities probably won’t release unless compelled by their own courts to release. What can one US attorney, and one US legal group do about that? Not sure if this will go anywhere.

Bammy’s the fool though..