To: ken5050; Huber; Kolokotronis
As regards TEC, yes, this is 100% correct -- they're not likely to surprise us, nor do we care (much, except for some sadness over the fate of that church). And CofE seems to be becoming pretty much of the same ilk.
Yet things haven't all been played out in the world-wide Anglican Communion, and who knows what might come up in the Continuing churches?
Perhaps the list could be re-purposed away from TEC and towards the ("rest of the" / real) Anglican world. WHat do you think?
31 posted on
08/03/2009 10:41:34 AM PDT by
sionnsar
(IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Neda Agha-Soltan - one victim of murderous regime)
To: sionnsar; ken5050; Kolokotronis
Perhaps the list could be re-purposed away from TEC and towards the ("rest of the" / real) Anglican world. WHat do you think? Yes! However, a change to the banner stating (truthfully with charity) that TEC is not within the scope of interest of the list would be helpful in avoiding misunderstandings.
32 posted on
08/03/2009 11:02:44 AM PDT by
Huber
(And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. - John 1:5)
To: sionnsar; Huber
I concur. Another reason why I support “refocusing” the ping list is that time is limited...there’s so much to read and keep up with, courtesy of Zero...that I don’t need to waste my time reading, let alone commenting on threads about the current “lunacy du jour” of TEC...and the Madwoman who runs the joint..
34 posted on
08/03/2009 7:19:48 PM PDT by
ken5050
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson