What explanation?
That they hastily snagged a pitifully done edit and then posted it as proof?
Sheesh.
Now I have to email these people.
Sounds like we have two differing camps on what the original document contains based on internet images.
The physical paper copy that was submitted by Orly Taitz is now the only verifiable evidence after what I’ve seen take place in these discussions.
It would be enlightening to hear from her directly as to what the actual document number and birth registrar are indicated as on the hard copy she submitted to the court.