Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CodeToad

At what point does the military-man’s oath both allow and compel him to consider the leaders of the state to be domestic enemies?

At what point, if any, will the people cause the Dissent of the Governed to replace the Consent of the Governed?


22 posted on 08/06/2009 6:26:38 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: OneWingedShark
At what point does the military-man’s oath both allow and compel him to consider the leaders of the state to be domestic enemies?

We've been there for a while now. The destruction that this Marxist meat puppet and his minders have wreaked on the American Republic is nothing less than an act of war.

In a better world, they would all swing from gallows lining he Capitol Mall.

34 posted on 08/06/2009 6:46:39 AM PDT by Noumenon (Work that AQT - turn ammunition into skill. No tyrant can maintain a 300 yard perimeter forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: OneWingedShark

“At what point does the military-man’s oath both allow and compel him to consider the leaders of the state to be domestic enemies?”

A non-tested point, of course. I always thought “domestic enemies” would be revolutionaries against the US. I never thought it would be the actual government elected officials.


40 posted on 08/06/2009 6:57:53 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson