Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army National Guard Recruiting FEMA Camp Or 'Internment/Resettlement' Specialists
Canada Free Press ^ | August 5, 2009 | staff

Posted on 08/08/2009 6:38:12 AM PDT by kellynla

The Army National Guard is now recruiting individuals to fill job positions described as an internment/resettlement specialist according to job postings on Monster.Com and other employment based Internet sites such as one listed here. In other words, they are recruiting individuals to man facilities that could be used to house political dissidents, so-called terrorists and other individuals that the government doesn’t like. The term “resettlement” indicates that individuals holding this job position could also be responsible for moving people to other locations against their will. It is a documented fact that the U.S. government has numerous facilities at their disposal that could easily be used to house large numbers of people. Combine that, with this new job posting by the Army National Guard, and it seems as if the U.S. government is continuing to prepare for an eventual popular uprising.

Let’s look at some of the evidence we have of the U.S. government’s intentions to establish the infrastructure that could be used to house large numbers of political dissidents, so-called terrorists and other individuals the U.S. government wants locked up.

HR 645 the National Emergency Centers Establishment Act is a proposed bill in the U.S. House of Representatives that would authorize FEMA to build no less than six National Emergency Centers throughout the U.S. on closed or open military facilities. These facilities are to be designed to house large numbers of people. Why would emergency centers need to be built on closed or open military facilities unless there was a need to keep people from coming in and out of them?

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: army; bho44; bhofema; camp; camps; cwiiping; fema; femacamps; internment; nationalguard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-182 next last
To: SUSSA

You will have to take that up with the National Guard, for whom you have so much scorn. You will have to take that up with the National Guard, for whom you have so much scorn.


121 posted on 08/08/2009 9:19:39 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
The Constitution and its principles came before Lincoln or FDR. They can be judged on mores that preceded their time.
122 posted on 08/08/2009 9:20:56 AM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
The door was one of the first things the FBI/USARMY hid but there are pictures in many places.

There are grisly pics here be warned!

http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/WACO/waco.html

123 posted on 08/08/2009 9:22:11 AM PDT by Howie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

But the 1787 constitutional accommodation of slavery, I take it, should be? Or not?


124 posted on 08/08/2009 9:26:38 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
on an earlier thread somebody posted the actual want ad... do they think we are BLIND as well a stooopid??? LAL.
125 posted on 08/08/2009 9:27:44 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist -ww- I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

You’re the one who claimed tha National Guard “would never do this”. If the National Guard would violate the Constitution on the orders of a local mayor why would you believe they would not violate the Constitution on orders from the President?

I would like to hear your reasoning in coming to that conclusion.


126 posted on 08/08/2009 9:32:24 AM PDT by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA

I said the National Guard would not round up law-abiding citizens and put them in internment camps. I guess I have a higher opinion of National Guard troops than you do.


127 posted on 08/08/2009 9:35:42 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
In reference to ‘rounding up’ Islamic people, he said he would always side with Islam.

True, but if the Islamists ever lit-off a dirty bomb (or worse) here, he might "side with Islam" by interning his Muslims buddies... to prevent them from being cut to ribbons by livid Americans.

If you look at the way the federal government holds annual multi-agency field exercises (usually scripted as natural disasters and related emergency response operations), it's pretty obvious that they're also preparing for the Muslim terrorists' SOP: multiple simultaneous attacks.

128 posted on 08/08/2009 9:39:25 AM PDT by Charles Martel ("Endeavor to persevere...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

If they would break into law-abiding citizens’ homes and confiscate their lawfully owned firearms on orders from a local mayor, on what do you base your belief that they would not round up and inter citizens for no other reason than the President said were a national risk and ordered it?


129 posted on 08/08/2009 9:41:50 AM PDT by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

You’re quick with the non-sequitur.


130 posted on 08/08/2009 9:45:51 AM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

“No apologies. But a book recommendation:... “

Oh, come now! That’s not how the game’s played here. You’re hiding the ball.

Try to be a bit more forthcoming in defense of your statement. I suggest you’re much better than that. :-)

Citing a whole damned book in support of a position would get a rather extended and pregnant silence in most college classrooms. Simply because Lincoln abused the rights of citizens, does not mean there was justification in the Constitution for such actions, or that such abuses should be used as justification for such shenanigans by future governments. That’s why the government is based on the Constitution. It is also why rights of the citizenry are not derived from government (though many pols would have us believe otherwise).

You cited FP #10 in defense of Japanese-American internment (using #10 as a justification for your statement rather stretches that work beyond recognition, IMHO)but if you don’t want to play I can understand.


131 posted on 08/08/2009 10:01:20 AM PDT by Habibi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: steveo

“Fake ad IMO”

Let us all know what it is about this ad that you “think” is “fake”...
http://www.nationalguard.com/careers/mos/description.php?mos_code=31E


132 posted on 08/08/2009 10:01:54 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Howie
October 1994 Marine questionnaire out of the Twentynine Palms Marine Base in California.

It is interesting that this URL has been blocked by the site owner and all traces of this story have been scrubbed from the net. It was a well known story a few years ago on FR.

133 posted on 08/08/2009 10:23:39 AM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA

I remember that. The NRA sued and I believe won a judgement. As I remember, the court ordered the guns returned, not that they were needed after the fact.

I remember seeing on the local news a big CHP officer body slamming a little old grandma to the floor because she produced her little pistol to show them she had “protection, food and water and dogfood and wanted to stay in her home.”

I was embarrased for a moment to be a Californian. What the CHP was doing there I don’t know?


134 posted on 08/08/2009 11:02:13 AM PDT by Howie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Have you tried www.archive.org ? Just asking, as it can find lots of stuff that has been “lost to the ages”.


135 posted on 08/08/2009 11:06:59 AM PDT by Habibi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Habibi

I think that is the site that gave me the “site blocked by owner” page. Kind of strange when the Way Back Machine gets stumped.


136 posted on 08/08/2009 11:11:18 AM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

It is usually pretty good about such things. I also wonder who and what can have stuff scrubbed from its volumes. Pretty good resource for something that started out using castoff surplus equipment.


137 posted on 08/08/2009 11:34:31 AM PDT by Habibi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Again because the ad refers to a .com domain, not a .mil domain. And checking the Internet Wayback Machine, the domain has had pretty much nothing but placeholders since registered in 2000.
I believe very little of whats presented as fact anymore.
However I see now that the ad appears on goarmy.com, a legit site so I admit my first thinking is wrong. But still I ask why is the National Guard, posting an ad on a site run by some goober in Nashville?
138 posted on 08/08/2009 11:46:09 AM PDT by steveo (Two Thousand Ten - Never Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: CatDancer

The “I’m gonna need a bigger roll of tin foil” ping.


139 posted on 08/08/2009 12:02:54 PM PDT by green pastures (Soylent green? More like solvent green: health care reform to kill folks and 'save' social security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Habibi
I also wonder who and what can have stuff scrubbed from its volumes.

I wonder that too. Some is self-scrubbed. I found about a hundred-fold more hits on Yahoo search than I did on Google.

140 posted on 08/08/2009 12:36:30 PM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson