Exactly-
What methodology has been tested enough to predict backwards millions of years accurately when simple questions that I mentioned earlier haven’t been answered?
There are wide ranging historical reports from all over the globe placing dinosaur like creatures within the last 2000 years.
Why are these constantly debunked as “ folklore” by the scientific community instead of being looked at as documentation to be followed up on?
Why do those questions have to be answered before radiometric dating can be tested as a dating method/ If you don't think radiometric dating is accurate enough to use, what test do you submit they should be using instead that would be more accurate?
There are wide ranging historical reports from all over the globe placing dinosaur like creatures within the last 2000 years.
Why are these constantly debunked as “ folklore” by the scientific community instead of being looked at as documentation to be followed up on?
How do you propose testing a "historical report" against an artifact that may or may not be related to that report? On what basis does an unsubstantiated report of "dinosaur-like creatures within the last 2000 years" warrant the conclusion that any dinosaur fossil found must be only a few thousand years old, even if the physical properties of the artifact indicate that it is much older than that?