Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is from the HUMAN EVENT as received by email. It this a scam or the real thing?

Can some of the Legal Beagles among the Freepers can comment on this?

It seems to be if that should come to pass, the States choose the delegates, not the Congress. They can stay the hell out of it!

Any comments on this?

1 posted on 08/15/2009 7:11:24 AM PDT by Sen Jack S. Fogbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

Yes, it’s true Congress can call a constitutional convention. I’m not sure how many delegates have to vote to change a part of the constitution.


2 posted on 08/15/2009 7:13:49 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

Go Ahead...make my day! I don’t believe Obama, Pelosi and the Czars would go down that path, which is a sure-fire way to start a revolution and-or inflame secession movements.


3 posted on 08/15/2009 7:18:10 AM PDT by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

I’m confused by it....I thought, for some reason, there were many on the right calling FOR a Constitutional Convention. I’ll be interested in reading some posts from more knowledgeable freepers who can explain.


4 posted on 08/15/2009 7:18:13 AM PDT by Kimberly GG (Sarah Palin supports a "path to citizenship" = AMNESTY for illegal aliens. .... DEMINT '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
“What would you think if an amendment to the U.S. Constitution was introduced by liberal Democrat Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, which repealed the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights — taking away our right to Free Speech?”

I think she would be arrested and tried for treason.

5 posted on 08/15/2009 7:19:18 AM PDT by BigCinBigD ('Evil white devil since 1960')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

OBAMA'S BRIDGE TOO FAR


THE STORM UNLEASHED ON AMERICA

A PETITION ON FACEBOOK FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RESTORATION

6 posted on 08/15/2009 7:19:53 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

Health care reform and cap and tax both are unconstitutional if one studies the provisions and precepts.
Democrats are communists and most left wing voters do not realize their evil and how they will destroy America.
Americans voted in the first communist administration and that is their sin.


7 posted on 08/15/2009 7:21:02 AM PDT by kindred (A third party of conservatives only is the only answer. You can not put new wine in old wineskin's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
The Constitution only means what ever the 9 political hacks that sit on the Supreme Court say it does. I don't think they've read it in years.
8 posted on 08/15/2009 7:26:19 AM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

A “Con Con”? Usually, for something to have a nickname, it needs to have some historical examples to give some resonance to the nickname.

Sure, there is a provision for such an event, but absent any evidence of any groundswell toward a constitutional convention, how can the authoring group possibly use such an improbable stretch as a fundraising campaign?


9 posted on 08/15/2009 7:27:31 AM PDT by Migraine (Diversity is great... ...until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
It's false.

Any Amendment proposed by a Convention needs to be ratified by 38 states.

11 posted on 08/15/2009 7:29:08 AM PDT by Jim Noble (I hope Sarah will start a 2nd party soon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

It’s that place and time in the historical path of the progress of our Nation for there to be a Constitutional Convention for adjustments to be made to the Constitution to clarify, or strengthen some of the language in the Constitution to lessen the chances of successful Leftist judicial activism, and to ease the defense of founding intent.

It’s not the place and time in the historical path of this Nation for such a Constitutional Convention with unbalanced leadership in place.

What it is genuinely time for is a remake of the scene in Washington D.C. that would reflect the vision of the founders.

We have to stop what we are doing no matter what it is right now, and clean up the mess we’ve allowed to accumulate so we can progress unencumbered by the build-up of undesireable debris.


13 posted on 08/15/2009 7:30:39 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

The proposed amendments to strike the First and Second from the record would be supported by the country as the change we need, as well as supported by people like Graham as a bipartisan effort.


14 posted on 08/15/2009 7:32:25 AM PDT by wastedyears (The Tree is thirsty and the hogs are hungry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson