White House Acknowledges Unsolicited E-Mails on Health Care

FoxNews.com ^ | 08.16.2009 | FoxNew/Major Garret

[boxerblues]

they need to have their records subpoenaed to see who authorized axeltoads email

[DYngbld]

I wonder if this guy is on "The List"

GOVDELIVERY.COM

Registrant: Make this info private
GovDocs Inc.
380 Jackson Street
Suite 550
St. Paul, MN 55101
US

Domain Name: GOVDELIVERY.COM

Administrative Contact , Technical Contact : Sommerness, David
dave.sommerness@GOVDOCS.COM
380 Jackson Street
Suite 550
SAINT PAUL, MN 55101
US
Phone: (651) 726-7300
Fax: (651) 665-0943

Record expires on 26-Jul-2010
Record created on 18-May-2004
Database last updated on 08-Jul-2009

[DYngbld]

There are some days I just love being a geek. You can find out the coolest information. With just a few key strokes.

[hoosiermama]

FOX is covering now. ACLU is actually on our side , first amendment infringed upon. He he he....

[donna]

I sent an email to Major Garrett just to cover the bases per your comment. You never know what will help.

[BP2]

You can't un-ring a bell.

Yep, no more than you can UN-rob a bank.

"Here's the money back ... we're sorry."

[boxerblues]

see the post 197 it come from

http://www.govdelivery.com/

a government mailing house of some sort

[boxerblues]

I know for a fact that mine came from flag@whitehouse.gov as this was a email account I set up the same day it hit FR about this WH site. Other are reporting that by contacting Congress or from googling information got them on the list.

I hope Fox News gets a FOIA on who sent these out and how they got the names.

[leilani]

The next questions Major Garrett should ask Gibbs and Company are: What third party or parties got access to emails sent to the White House? Why was a third party given access to emails addressed to the White House? Which such third parties are political entities?

And don't forget question #4: Which third parties can we expect will surreptitiously be awarded unimpeded access to private citizens' medical records without their permission & in direct contravention of generally accepted standards of privacy protection should this White House be successful in its ambition to seize control over those as well.

[Shelayne]

Now that really raises the level on my hinky meter, and it gives me the heebs.