Really????? No consideration for how many dogs were killed? No consideration for the various methods of how the dogs were killed? No consideration that the reason why he killed the dogs is that they were no longer any good for fighting (oh, yeah, he wasn’t just killing dogs - he was using them for sport and profit - but we won’t mention that). No consideration for the fact that illegal gambling was a motivating factor, or the fact that drug use/abuse/sales was also conducted during the dog fighting events? Wow. Just incredible.
I don’t know what you mean by “no consideration”.
I consider killing a man at least one order of magnitude greater a transgression than killing dogs and gambling combined.
You are, of course, free to disagree.