Thank God you’re not a Family Court judge.
Never an intention of mine. But I am sick and tired of people on this forum railing on how bitter and vindictive mothers are against the child’s father. It is a two way street. The court found that this child was well adjusted socially and academically, she was attending public school for supplemental education. And the ruling was presented as she is too religious and needs to test that in a more
“secular” environment.
She is being exposed to the secular environment already. So the real reason for the opinion is to limit religious freedom.