"A witness from the scene told KTLA the man who got his finger bitten off was walking through the anti-reform group to get to the pro-reform group when he got in an altercation with someone from the anti-reform side. The man apparently punched the person from the anti-reform side. In the scuffle that ensued, that person bit the man's pinky finger, severing it."
Well, I guess I’ll find out what really happened from the eeevil FOX News...
heck of a bite. wonder if it was staged (dems will do anything for their leader, even cut off their own finger) semi-satire alert
Is it clear who "that person" is?
Unfortunately, due to the poor education and poor writing skills of most journalists these days, that may not be the case. There have clearly been different ways of phrasing what happened, with one story implying the pro-reform person was the biter and another story implying it was the anti-reform person who was the biter.
Why can't they just spell it out??
Moral of the story: Do not provoke senior citizens who may have sharpened dentures!
This came from “a witness at the scene” talking to KTLA. So, we have no way to know if the witness is a lying ostammer scumbag or a legitimate witness. Further, if a lone pro-reform guy walked through our people, then he must have started the trouble/been there for that purpose. Primal instinct tells us to stay out of the enemy camp (especially if we’re 65 years old) unless we’re trying to attract their attention. I also think the use of the term “anti-reform” indicates the story came from the ostammerites. We are not anti-reform and we don’t refer to our side with that term.
Wow, this is the complete flip flop of what other reports are saying...hmmm..
But whatever occurred, aren't you just glad for Obama bringing healing and hope to the nation and a spirit of post partisanship..</s>