To: GodGunsGuts
This guy has some convoluted model which in his mind shows that using SOME of the data, indicates that Mercury MIGHT be 6000 years old, based on what he THINKS he knows about the nature and origin of Mercury's magnetic field.
One of the problems with this is that the nature of Mercury's magnetic field is not fully understood. It is not like Earths. Google it.
15 posted on
09/04/2009 9:05:38 AM PDT by
Paradox
(ObamaCare = Logan's Run ; There is no Sanctuary!)
To: Paradox
My predicted four percent decrease in only 33 years would be very hard for evolutionary theories of planetary magnetic fields to explain, Evolutionary theories of planetary magnetic fields?
Do these jokers think that Darwin discussed Mercury or magnetic fields?
22 posted on
09/04/2009 9:16:31 AM PDT by
Toddsterpatriot
(Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
To: Paradox
So now you’re up to Humphreys’ level?
Dream!
182 posted on
09/04/2009 1:45:52 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson