I didn't get away with it. I corrected myself unlike you. Who still claim it means something of a gift to Sternberg to be sponsored.
Back to the point,
That was adequately demonstrated by two investigations, despite your opinion to the contrary. Rave oon. The two investigations still remain pointing out the mistreatment of Sternberg.
So you were hoping they'd railroad Sternberg.
Are you really that dense?
Doesn't make it valid, even if true.
Okay so it is true.
No, that would be fact, by their own admission. The Wedge Document describes a publicity campaign...
No. You are not going to get away with that twisting of your statement which was ..."That would be the ongoing public fascination created by the modern ID movement guided by the Wedge Document". The public fascination was mentioned by Shapiro in his comments about general biological findings. So don't try a bald-faced lie about it just a few postings away from the quote.
Actually, many ID scientists are able to compartmentalize. Even the NCSE realized this in their emails.
B.S. are you a psychologist now? Your arguments are pitiful. Remember "NCSE HAD NO BUSINESS..." And if so, what is the complaint about Sternberg then? His science is published routinely in peer reviewed manuals. IOW, he is a "real" scientist according to your personal definition.
RA status is a privilege.
The two investigations still remain pointing out the mistreatment of Sternberg.
Investigations I proved to be flawed.
Are you really that dense?
You're the one railing against the involvement of Sternberg's main defender.
You are not going to get away with that twisting of your statement
People have been interested in science in general. This modern-day supposed controversy and growing public interest in it is the result of the planned and coordinated ID campaign.
NCSE HAD NO BUSINESS
According to you.
IOW, he is a "real" scientist according to your personal definition.
He was able to compartmentalize. Eventually he wasn't able to do that and thus blew his professional reputation as a scientist, something that caused much resentment among his colleagues.
Oh, I forgot, that couldn't have been resentment he himself caused, it was unwarranted persecution, right? When someone is irresponsible and conspires to push a substandard paper through a prestigious journal there should be no repercussions if he's an IDer.
Failure to take responsibility for your actions, cry persecution over the natural repercussions to your actions. Hmmm, that sounds familiar...
Congratulations, you are now on the road to being a politically-correct protected class!