Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat
A fact that the report glosses over because it was written for the consumption of ID backers.

You need the five dollars. You cast about your charges as if they mean something. The letters from the SI were not targeted at ID backers. And the report was not targeted at ID backers, it was targeted at the Smithsonian.

Santorum and Souder weren't ID backers?

Don't try strawmen arguments with me. You remain the liar.

Second-hand. Show me in the emails where she actually claimed Sternberg was a YEC.

OTOH, it's interesting that a bunch of creationists would call such a claim slanderous.

So you are calling Sues a liar? In any case, you continue to fail to read the report and the emails. This is a quote from Scott's email.

Regarding von Sternberg's views, he is, in fact a YEC.

OTOH, it's interesting that a bunch of creationists would call such a claim slanderous

No the word is " misinformation" You are weak.

810 posted on 09/11/2009 5:29:03 AM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 809 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC
The letters from the SI were not targeted at ID backers.

Duh.

And the report was not targeted at ID backers

That's just false. What do you think a staff report is? It's written to tell a congresscritter what he wants to hear. Unless you want to try to say again that Souder and Santorum weren't ID backers.

Regarding von Sternberg's views, he is, in fact a YEC.

Either she's lying or she knows more than we do. You earlier even tried to say he's not an IDer.

No the word is " misinformation" You are weak.

Slanderous has been used in this case.

811 posted on 09/11/2009 6:39:40 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 810 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson