Replies

I refuse to believe that so many people are incapable of comprehending my simple question. However, I'll provide you a picture and see if you can follow. Let's say that you find this arch on Mars:

Would you:
A. Think it was the result of an unbelievably improbable statistical anomaly of nature.
B. Think someone designed it.

That was the simple question put out there. A simple question to test whether the reader had the willingness to change their mind in the face of overwhelming evidence, if such evidence were presented.

So far, the level of obfuscation in response points to a closed mindedness on the subject. It is impossible to sway people with mere logic, when they have proved themselves capable of rejecting things regardless of facts.

People who won't answer a clear hypothetical are generally insecure, but rabidly devout in their positions. No sense arguing with them, or in this case even pursuing with the test.

I’ll play your tangent game..

Seeing a clearly made by man structure, I would presume a man made it. Seeing the same structure on another planet, I would presume an alien made it.

BUT, you’ve now twisted the discussion to YOUR PATHETIC PIGEON HOLE away from the orignal statement.

Seeing “and arch”, what was stated in the original, I would presume that natural forces of erosion created it. No, I didn’t see it happen, but I can see the process occuring in real time. I didn’t see the Grand Canyon “made” but I can see the millions of tons per year of silt washing through the Colorado and presume that erosion had something to do with it.

I refuse to believe that so many people are incapable of comprehending my simple question.

Answer me this question with a simple yes or no answer and you may understand the problem here:

Have you stopped beating your wife?

It is a very simple question, so you should be capable of answering it.