Behe testified that man evolved over billions of years from simple organisms.
Poor guy. You’re confused and are using the fallacy of composition as though it is an argument. It isn’t. It’s a fallacy.
Everyone isn’t required to accept every word of Behe’s testimony before they can object to those misrepresenting Behe’s testimony. The point is that Behe did not testify that ‘ID is no different than astrology’.
Is that difficult for you to understand?