You appear to be arguing with yourself, as you can’t comprehend my point.
[[You appear to be arguing with yourself, as you cant comprehend my point.]]
I comprehended it just fine- you’re arguing that it’s better to show it’s ‘exremely unlikely on any world in any universe’ and that’s exactly what hte artile pointed out- with one key difference- the article points out it’s impossible- not simpyl ‘extremely unlikely’, and another key point is that people don’t even blink when you explain to htem that macvoreolvution VIOLATES several key scientific laws- and they certainly aren’t goign to be convinced by an argument that mathematically, it’s ‘extremely unlikely’ when they don’t even accept the fact that it’s mathematically imposdible
Your argument has develved into a slavage attempt which doesn’t cut hte mustard- arguing that soemthign is ‘extremely unlikely’ isn’t goign to impress nyone that doesn’t even comprehend the concept of impossibility- you are suggesting that people will be more impressed by and grateful of, someone that will give them $10 than they will be with someone who gives them $1,000,000