This has been explained to evolutionists ad nauseum, with no effect. They repeat the same misrepresentation even after having the truth explained to them.
If you would actually read Dr. Behe's testimony instead of letting hack evolutionist websites do your thinking for you; you would see that Dr. Behe testified that ID was falsifiable in the same manner that astrology had been falsified.
But hey, don't let the truth get in the way of your beliefs.
==But hey, don’t let the truth get in the way of your beliefs.
I wonder if the evos realize that their entire worldview can be summed up by the very last word of your reply.
But hey, don't let the truth get in the way of your beliefs.
I'm not sure what you're reading. I'm looking at the Kitzmiller v. Dover trial transcript from day 11, PM session Part 1.
Dr. Behe admits he is not using the standard definition of the word "theory", and he agrees with counsel that he's using it in the sense of the word "hypothesis."
Dr. Behe also admits that doing this would include disciplines such as astrology. The fact that he believes that both of these "theories" are falsifiable through similar means doesn't change a word of my post.
Especially since Dr. Behe also admits that he doesn't believe intelligent design is a theory in the sense that the NSA defines the term.