Replies

Well that sucks but the arguments that he put forth counters the Government arguments in the same case will same amount weight to the judge as it would to Orly's plaintiffs. Her plaintiffs still benefit.

Yes, to a certain extent. However, for example, Kreep has no military clients, and he has no state representative clients. So, there's no argument on the record with respect to them. Orly - to represent her clients effectively -- simply MUST file her own papers, making THEIR arguments, not just the argument of an elector and a VP candidate.

OK , they could resubmit by changing the Title and use the same arguments that was used in their Opposition to Limit Discovery, And add all the plaintiffs to it. We do like paperwork. ;-)

I suspect that Kreep's Motion to Dismiss will contain much of the same arguments as in his Opposition. Of course, Taitz has said that she will refuse to work with him and is working on a motion to disqualify him, so there's just no way she is going to let him put all the plaintiffs/ names on his papers. Again, Taitz still must represent HER clients, who have different interests than Kreep's clients.