[El Gato]

The sentence you quoted doesn't assert as a fact that Obama is not a natural born citizen due to his admission against interest that he was a dual citizen status at birth, rather it only asks Obama to confirm a weak confusing statement he is not eligible due to his father not being a US citizen.

Perhaps because that is the real test, that is the father's nationality. What some other country considers a person to be is of no importance. It's the parent's citizenship when the child is born, not the child's "dual" citizenship, if any. Even if the parent's country doesn't consider the child one of it's nationals, the child may not be a natural born citizen.

[Seizethecarp]

Orly described Obama’s father as his natural rather than legal father and cited the father's non-citizenship rather then the child of the father being “governed by the BNA of 1948.

This appears to me to be a deliberate attempt to call Obama’s eligibility into question even if discovery were to show that either there was no legal marriage recorded in HI or the marriage was bigamous.

However, absent a legal marriage between Obama’s parents, Stanley Ann was a single US citizen mom and the 1948 BNA would not have made Obama a dual citizen. No foreign sovereign would have any claim over Obama, as the founders stated to be their concern at the time of the drafting the natural born citizen language.