Posted on 09/18/2009 8:59:47 AM PDT by steve-b
Those ticket taxes you pay when you fly can really cause the price to jump, but now a new report reveals some of that money is going to airports that only service private planes.
An investigation by USA Today reveals millions of dollars in taxes collected from commercial passengers are going to little used airports that only service private planes, including over 50 airports in Kansas....
(Excerpt) Read more at ksn.com ...
And I hear parts of the federal gas tax go to upkeep of roads in rural Alaska. What a travesty! /s
USA Today on Thursday published a slanted, one-sided front-page story designed to whip up negative sentiment against general aviation and to perpetuate public misconceptions about GA. NBC’s "Today" show did a companion story that also ran on the MSNBC cable news outlet which was equally as negative, although it was somewhat more balanced in its presentation.
“The story is completely devoid of journalistic balance and fails to acknowledge the millions of Americans who benefit from the nation's 5,200 general aviation airports every day,” said AOPA President Craig Fuller.
AOPA’s media relations staff learned of the story a week before it was published and had a lengthy conversation with the USA Today reporter, but was not included in the article.
The USA Today article focuses on spending at GA airports but provides absolutely no perspective. The article does not mention how much Airport Improvement Program (AIP) money is spent at air carrier airports, or that in a typical year, Congress allocates $3 for air carrier airport improvements to every $1 to be spent at GA airports.
The USA Today article and its companion Today Show piece both entice the audience to equate airline ticket tax income with airport expenditures. Neither story makes any effort to tell the audience that GA operators contribute to the same trust fund through fuel taxes that are five times higher than the airlines’, or that the fund also pays for the air traffic control system, of which the airlines are the primary beneficiary.
Let’s look at 2007, a fairly typical year for AIP funding.
The FAA distributed $3.34 billion in AIP funds to 2,610 airports.
341 primary airports—airports with more than 100,000 passenger boardings each year—received $2.1 billion in AIP funds. That’s an average of $6.17 million per airport.
48 commercial service airports—airports with between 2,500 and 100,000 passenger boardings—received $93 million, or an average of $1.94 million per airport.
139 GA reliever airports received $214 million, or an average of $1.54 million
982 GA airports received $617 million, or an average of $628,000.
Combined, the 389 airline airports divvied up $2,199,335,046, averaging $5.5 million per airport. The 1,121 GA airports shared $831,717,227, averaging $741,942.
An addition, $310 million was distributed through state block grant programs.
On the same day that the two stories ran nationally, a number of local news outlets did their own versions of the story and came to radically different conclusions.
“Officials defend role of small airports: Facilities open more areas to business world,” reported Nashville’s The Tennessean newspaper.
“Local airports say fed funds put to good use,” said the Greenville News of Greenville, S.C.
And, “Business taking off,” stated The Record of Stockton, Calif., simply.
Two years ago, when the Associated Press ran a similarly negative article on federal dollars going to GA airports, the same thing happened: local follow-up stories showed that the money was well spent and benefitted the communities.
“Having convenient access to small airports in communities around the country is as vital to our national transportation system as having highway off-ramps in small towns,” concluded Fuller. “To suggest that smaller airports are not needed is just like suggesting that we should have a road system that connects only the country’s 150 largest cities.
“The truth is that small airports do bring business, jobs, and services—including disaster relief, package delivery, firefighting capability, law enforcement, and emergency medical transportation—to thousands of communities nationwide every day. And that’s good for America.”
Excerpt:
The Murtha airport has received a total of $150 million in funding and currently receives about $1.5 million a year. The three daily flights — all to Washington — leave the Johnstown airport, and quite often the airplanes are half-empty.
Some of our state and fed taxes are used to maintain side streets that most commercial transportation vehicles aren’t even capable of using. This is outrageous! /s
Thanks Steve-B...we can always count on you for posting the party line on any economic subject, especially what can be marginalized as business welfare/subsidies.
I know...I’m a pilot. Note the /sarc tag.
And some of my federal gas taxes are being paid to major airports. Some of my property and sales taxes are going to Denver International! The travesty! Major airlines getting their airports subsidized by consumer taxes!!!
Between 1942 and 1962 a 10% rail ticket tax was levied on railroads as a war measure to discourage unnecessary travel. This tax generated revenues of over $5 Billion, which went into the general revenue fund and ironically, was used in some cases to build more airports and highways. In today's dollars, that probably would amount to about $100 billion and one wonders what would have happened if that money had been invested in rail service after the war. By the time, the tax was lifted, the passenger train was already on the ropes.
-Source: report by USDOT Secretary William Coleman, 1977
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.