[...because he will be better than the ‘rat alternative.]
That is the same reason Bush was elected TWICE: most people voted against the idiots the Rats put up, instead of for Democrat-Lite Bush! The only thing Bush was conservative on was foreign policy (and I appreciate him for that), but everything else he was a DEMOCRAT! He didn’t know how to say “NO” to my money!
If we get into the mode of “better this than that” you loose your base and the independents because NO ONE knows where you stand!
Trying to hold on to power in the US is like squeezing sand - the harder you squeeze, the more it falls through your fingers. Let’s not worry about holding on to what we have; let’s LEAD our nation, people and the human experiment FORWARD!
This is a dangerous proposition, but it is the truth. We have to find better candidates and elect them. The key is the primary. So whom is to run?
Trying to hold on to power in the US is like squeezing sand - the harder you squeeze, the more it falls through your fingers. Let’s not worry about holding on to what we have; let’s LEAD our nation, people and the human experiment FORWARD!
Yes, but you must remember what Rush calls incrementalism. The 'rats are masters of incrementalism. They are patient and will take one grain of sand at a time until they have the whole sandbox. Guys like you who want "the whole sandbox or nothing" will likely end up with nothing.
I already told you Cornyn (and Kay B) oppose the health care bill. If White were in, he'd surely vote for it, as would any other 'rat. Hell, yes I'll vote for Cornyn over a 'rat. He may be a RINO, but at least he's not Arlen Sphincter.
If we lose the healthcare battle, the Republic will be in grave peril. A vote from a Cornyn can stave off disaster. An "I'll show 'em!" vote for a 'rat will be a vote for socialism, which once in place, will never go away.