Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: count-your-change

Well, not all evolutionists do...so you can stop now. Your use of the term refers only to those who describe themselves thus, but that’s irrelevant to discussions of, for example, Modern Evolutionqry Synthetics.


39 posted on 09/28/2009 2:18:08 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Gondring
In the 1966 edition of The American College Dictionary published by Random House,Inc., on page 308, under the word, “Darwinisim” is listed the term “Darwinist” as a noun and adjective with “Darwinite” as an alternative.

So, no, my use of the term DOES NOT refer just to the self described and since you are not in control of the vocabulary, I will continue to use the term “Darwinist” quite properly applied to evolutionists, thank you.

Modern Evolutionary Synthetics is just the triple knit lime green bell bottoms with white patent leather shoes repackaged as the new and improved Darwinism.

44 posted on 09/28/2009 9:54:19 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson